SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GX Investors Thread
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
586 21 0 GX
Emcee:  qveauriche Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
561"Here's another tidbit for the naysayers of the optical revolution; theMSI-2/25/2002
560Message 17106180 I'm not sure what it means, but it looks good [for Global Maurice Winn-2/25/2002
559<<i>Obviously before ranting, you've not taken the time to read pasMaurice Winn-2/25/2002
558The investment in the stock will pay off only if another plan challenges in courPaul Kern-2/24/2002
557Globalstar is thinking of including existing shareholders in a rights offering aMaurice Winn-2/23/2002
556I'm attracted by these shareholders suits that may, just may mind you, leavePaul Kern-2/23/2002
555Try GBLXQ.OBPaul Kern-2/23/2002
554is Global Crossing still trading? The symbol GX doesn't work any more, is tLarry S.-2/23/2002
553So far as I can tell, the MOST existing shareholders can hope for is the right tM. Charles Swope-2/23/2002
552So, is it worth investing in the stocks at 8 cents? What's the chance of thePaul Kern-2/23/2002
551Cyberspace growth rate from QUALCOMM slides 22 February: Past: qualcomm.com FMaurice Winn-2/23/2002
550$300 million cash for $12.4 bn in debt, that's 2.5c on the dollar. Plus 21%Maurice Winn-2/22/2002
549nytimes.com <<i>February 21, 2002 Global Crossing to File Another PlaMaurice Winn-2/22/2002
548b2j, Excellent - many thanks. I will do all of the above, and I hope a few thoMSI-2/18/2002
547The appropriate response for those opposed to the plan of reorganization, is tobuch2jerry-2/18/2002
546Hmmm, that's odd. globalcrossing.com doesn't work. It partly comes up aMaurice Winn-2/14/2002
545<<i>The new Globalstar owners, whoever they turn out to be (and I thinkMaurice Winn-2/14/2002
544The new Globalstar owners, whoever they turn out to be (and I think they alreadySelectric II-2/14/2002
543Well, I've discussed that at length and tried to make that idea make sense, Maurice Winn-2/14/2002
542<i>If Global Crossing is anything like Globalstar, which I know a lot moreSelectric II-2/14/2002
541<<Without debt financing, most shareholders wouldn't get the higher loCYBERKEN-2/14/2002
540<<i>Now, if it took some smoothing over with the current equity holdersMaurice Winn-2/14/2002
539I do understand where shareholders reside in the pecking order - near the bottomBonzo-2/14/2002
538As an unfortunate bondholder, I can tell you I would take some kind of compellindevonian-2/13/2002
537agreed -- truly amazing how high-growth business managers can forget the only esMSI-2/13/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News