SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
VLSI Technology - Waiting for good news from NASDAQ !!!
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
6565 16 0 VLSI
Emcee:  Michel Eftimakis Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5615 Linda, according to "schmoogenboogen" (what a name... I hope I spellotter-3/9/1999
5614 That's consistent with other news we've been hearing. STM could be one Linda Kaplan-3/9/1999
5613 Jim posted that there's another suitor, as if it were definite. It wasn'Linda Kaplan-3/9/1999
5612 Yahoo thread poster suggests that because of business ties, the buyer through Lotter-3/9/1999
5611 Yet another perspective on the announcement: messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com otter-3/9/1999
5610 Au Contraire (or however it's spelled). We were diluted the day those optiotter-3/9/1999
5609 "Couldn't the buyer through LEHM also be a trader, buying for the sameotter-3/9/1999
5608 We've been diluted! According to CNBC, Philips just announced that the deaTScott-3/9/1999
5607 New News on VLSI. Saw Bob Pisani on CNBC 10 minutes ago stating that Philips haRam Seetharaman-3/9/1999
5606 Couldn't the buyer through LEHM also be a trader, buying for the same reasLinda Kaplan-3/9/1999
5605 From the Yahoo thread: messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com As good a confirmationotter-3/9/1999
5604 I still don't understand why they didn't go higher when they went hostiLinda Kaplan-3/9/1999
5603 Linda, PHG's offer was $17, so no reason to raise it when going hostile. TLarry S.-3/9/1999
5602 Why do you, or does anyone, think that PHG didn't offer more than $17 when Linda Kaplan-3/9/1999
5601 > ... why would they sell at $ 17, when $ 28 was inadequate last > year .Daniel-3/8/1999
5600 The difference between today and Friday is the spread between bid and asked. Iotter-3/8/1999
5599 First day after the hostile takeover VLSI closed down a picayune 1/16 on below Ram Seetharaman-3/8/1999
5598 What is happening: VLSI told Philips they want $25, PHG offered less. Both knowMaui Jim-3/8/1999
5597 Correction, $28 LSI offer has never been confirmed. If it's been confirmedlifeisgood-3/8/1999
5596 While I will be personally happy with $ 25+ offer, some holders who bought at $Ram Seetharaman-3/8/1999
5595 And in other news.... NICs are like popcorn. Nice to see VLSI has a piece of otter-3/8/1999
5594 Ram, I would have to agree... I understood the $17 bid to be just the first offDuane L. Olson-3/8/1999
5593 We all know that Philips wants VLSI. But they aren't going to get VLSI on aRam Seetharaman-3/8/1999
5592 One encouraging thing, if I understand the news items correctly, is that PhilliDuane L. Olson-3/8/1999
5591 Larry, I'd settle for a price above 20, to be sure. But that 28 dollar offDuane L. Olson-3/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News