SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5839 41 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Amboy Charlie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5664businessweek.com This is the complete article scroll down foe the part I put up duke of axc-7/22/2008
5663Notice he says "against Ampex management" like they are on trial?????duke of axc-7/22/2008
5662Here it is from the article Donald turkewich Jul 22, 2008 4:09 PM GMT Ampex isduke of axc-7/22/2008
5661Here is a chance to let Ampex management know what they are in for a head of timamenikr-7/22/2008
5660Hey guys it seems to me that things are starting to get a little TESTY around heduke of axc-7/22/2008
5659If you have to ask these questions, you should definitely NOT be calling. And ifJames Feldman-7/22/2008
5658<<<I'm still looking into what options we have. Meanwhile, thereNosaj-7/22/2008
5657Has anyone called and talked to the trustee ? Who are they, do you have a contaleigh aulper-7/22/2008
5656<<Your affidavit proves this is a scam bankruptcy on many fronts; can theyJames Feldman-7/22/2008
5655<<Can the court just rubber stamp this scam bankruptcy even though the othNosaj-7/22/2008
5654I understand that you are confused. But it is also apparent that you have not reJames Feldman-7/22/2008
5653<<Well then James, if it's so easily understand, then it stands to reaJames Feldman-7/22/2008
5652All this is confusing. I cant help but think Ampex is somehow trying to dump theDONALDX-7/21/2008
5651Well then James, if it's so easily understand, then it stands to reason the Nosaj-7/21/2008
5650There are two agreements you need to understand. Agreement #1 (“#1”) is dated 11James Feldman-7/21/2008
5649<<<The eye opener for me in James' investigation was the pension liNosaj-7/21/2008
5648See message #5630 for the answer.James Feldman-7/21/2008
5647On second thought, why do you think the judge would even read the letter ?mikehunt2-7/21/2008
5646I do not want to write your letters for you. You should read the Affidavit as maJames Feldman-7/21/2008
5645No I've haven't, like James said, just sending in letters without correcDAMNEDIFYOUDO-7/21/2008
5644Jim, why don't you put out a draft guide of what a letter should look like,mikehunt2-7/21/2008
5643Have you sent your letters in yet.mamenikr-7/21/2008
5642If I recall correctly, didn't Ampx state in a PR that they didn't have tDAMNEDIFYOUDO-7/21/2008
5641If you want to write a letter, be sure that it focuses on the PERTINENT issues. James Feldman-7/21/2008
5640Good article in todays WSJ on page B-4. " NEW BREED OF DIRECTORS REACHES mamenikr-7/21/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News