SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ampex Corp.
An SI Board Since June 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5839 41 0 AMPX
Emcee:  Amboy Charlie Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5739Item 1.01. Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement; Item 1.03. Bankruptcy or Paul Lee110/9/2008
5738OT: Congrats on the skins, Hal. Skins may have found a real coach. He has CamNosaj110/8/2008
5737Why don't you go FUCK yourself you ASSHOLE. Pardon my language to everyonechriscraft110/8/2008
5736OT wandered here, Online Compadres, out of force of old old habit.... Keep anHal Campbell-10/8/2008
5735Wasted days and wasted nights, pay your taxes then you die No more pimple No moYerMOLE-10/6/2008
5734Just don't be such a Gung-Ho Billion-Dollar-Bull-SYerMOLE-10/6/2008
5733If they are now canceled, still think the last holders of record will divide up DAMNEDIFYOUDO-9/30/2008
5732Is it over now New symbol AMPXQ.PK Nothing shows up Is the stock now zero and ajustlooking1-9/30/2008
5731Law makers want to know what is wrong with stockmarket all they have to do is tafuntimes_52-9/29/2008
5730Three rulers in succession be spring from different dynasty. WhYerMOLE-9/28/2008
5729Duke I guess this is OT but some quick random comments... The bad mortgages weHal Campbell-9/27/2008
5728I am posting this message today in the hope that his honor Judge Arthur J. Gonzaduke of axc-9/26/2008
5727Correct me if I'm mistaken, but didn't I read that Hillside was going toDAMNEDIFYOUDO-9/26/2008
5726"imo" hah! Only guys who believe in Fairy Tales were susceptible toYerMOLE-9/25/2008
5725<<<You "believed the patents were so strong". yet they wereNosaj-9/25/2008
5724You "believed the patents were so strong". yet they were old, outdaYerMOLE-9/25/2008
5723<<<Evidently, no one cares to admit how stupid they've been aboutNosaj-9/24/2008
5722Not a soul posting here for a long time. Evidently, no one cares to admit howYerMOLE-9/24/2008
5721I'm still afloat , Frank; and I am VERY glad your furniture isn't. Hal Campbell-9/14/2008
5720We all like to believe in things but with a stock that can be carried far too YerMOLE-9/9/2008
5719Sure did, Hal. Thank you for asking. Took a vacation to Panama City Beach and Nosaj-9/8/2008
5718I am not saying anything of the kind but the figure was not far from 50 know it mamenikr-9/8/2008
5717 You're saying that you owned a stock that went from $50 to 10 CENTS and YerMOLE-9/7/2008
5716What makes you right and perfect when you speaK about a POS and justice if i maymamenikr-9/2/2008
5715If calling people "stupid" & "fool" makes you smart and YerMOLE-9/2/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):