SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5769 <i>95% of unix servers were from Sun </i> Ravi, This is very hearSam Citron-10/21/1999
5768 Cool Don, Perhaps if IBM sells down to $40.00 or so.....we can get a 50 basisbrad greene-10/21/1999
5767 <!>Sold naked IBM April 85 puts today at 6. <!> thats free money fBrasco One-10/21/1999
5766 Sold naked IBM April 85 puts today at 6. Will be happy to buy the shares if theSam Citron-10/21/1999
5765 How big is the Legacy to Internet market? intface.commichel petit-10/21/1999
5764 Michael. <i>re:Hope this helps, but I'm not an ANALyst.</i> ThDorine Essey-10/21/1999
5763 want to know why IBM hardware is not selling? All you need to do is to goravi nair-10/21/1999
5762 thats a win/win trade. smart and wise.Brasco One-10/21/1999
5761 DB: Re: <i>just added a little IBM at 91.</i> I don't have anL. Adam Latham-10/21/1999
5760 WiseGuy, powerful argument! ><i>Why would one want to buy IBM, knowingGottfried-10/21/1999
5759 Anybody have short numbers for IBM? Seems like there would be a pop when short bargainman-10/21/1999
5758 I couldn't have said better myself Alex Raytselsky-10/21/1999
5757 Michael, <i>IBM is still into mainframes, something that's much lessTony Viola-10/21/1999
5756 Re: <i>IBM is blaming its poor result on Y2K, how ridiculous? Why MSFT isBill Martin-10/21/1999
5755 what overhead, the dude sleeping on the the bed on top of my bunk bed ... needBald Man from Mars-10/21/1999
5754 << All, Does this mean the entire year 2000 is shot to hell? >> NoBald Man from Mars-10/21/1999
5753 These Nuts are looking powerful... Did i ever tell you i don't like Overhea10K a day-10/21/1999
5752 > If you want something to short, consider MSFT. So, have you shorted MSFT?WiseGuy-10/21/1999
5751 Re: <i>All, Does this mean the entire year 2000 is shot to hell?</i&gBill Martin-10/21/1999
5750 IBM - Chart and Technicals Perhaps this whole IBM thing was a surprise for theTeresa Lo-10/21/1999
5749 average down by buying at 90 ... right now ... 'speculative buy' ratinBald Man from Mars-10/21/1999
5748 Re: <i>Months ago, LG was talking about seeing no Y2K slow down and I thiBill Martin-10/21/1999
5747 just added a little IBM at 91.Brasco One-10/21/1999
5746 <<I also wish that the St. would see this for what it really is - a huge,Augustus Gloop-10/21/1999
5745 Greg - <i>Y2K is a software problem. You fix it by replacing old softwarDavid Eddy-10/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News