SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Berkeley Technology Limited (BLKYY)
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
955 25 0 BKLYY
Emcee:  xcr600 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
580J. Conley: Thanks for posting that interesting LPA article. eom.Paul Senior-9/7/2000
579Nice feature article on LPA (this find courtesy of someone on Yahoo!) It would J. Conley-9/7/2000
578LDP officially included in the FTSE 250, effective after close of trading SepteJ. Conley-9/7/2000
577Morgan, I could not agree more. Management IS a key factor, and I have no reaJ. Conley-9/7/2000
576JC, I for one am very appreciative of T's efforts, and have repeatedly highlSir Francis Drake-9/6/2000
575Here is confirmation of LDP's participation in the FBR conference on Monday.J. Conley-9/5/2000
574Lightchip (LDP investment)spun out from Lightpath Technologies LPTH. go.com Liarchitect*-9/5/2000
573VINA 09/05/00 : Coverage Initiated by Lehman Brothers: Buy $40 target. VINA $architect*-9/5/2000
572biz.yahoo.com lightchip.com Monday August 28, 7:31 am Eastern Time Press Releasxcr600-9/4/2000
571John here is what I came up with in the t/s data today. 21 1/2 30k buy 21 1/8 1xcr600-9/1/2000
570JD, it is very hard to tell just from T&S or LII (which w/ NYSE shows regionSir Francis Drake-9/1/2000
56948k & 66k buys ? from the 1-min chart on 9/1 @ 10:30 AM siliconinvestor.com architect*-9/1/2000
568PORTFOLIO UPDATE Changing # of shares of VINA to 3,044,402, pursuant to SEC filJ. Conley-9/1/2000
567Morgan, Agree with your comments. I have no problem with an argument that NUFJ. Conley-8/31/2000
566Well, LDP broke $20. This has been something of a barrier. The steady accumulatiSir Francis Drake-8/31/2000
565JOHN: I will try to curb my sardonic comments somewhat, and try to accompany tJames Calladine-8/31/2000
564Jim, I know your questions are rhetorical. Well, maybe not that flashback, crueJ. Conley-8/31/2000
563Needless to say, LDP is difficult to value. FBR did a sum of the parts in MayJ. Conley-8/31/2000
562LDP valuation model from yahoo, close to FBR price target of $42. messages.yahoarchitect*-8/29/2000
561Good point, there are some of these risks in the holdings. I was referring to.J. Conley-8/29/2000
560MORE LIFE AFTER IMPENDING DEATH NEWS.... <<<<Researchers: Chips sweJames Calladine-8/29/2000
559Thanks JC... one has to wonder how long will the PE remain that low ... even if AmericanVoter-8/29/2000
558<< None of following apply: No lawsuits. No long-term debt. No inventoryMangoBoy-8/29/2000
557Morgan, I agree with what you are saying, but could you in general be giving thJ. Conley-8/29/2000
556Amein, Yes, shares outstanding is approx. 64.4 million; float is much smaller.J. Conley-8/29/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News