SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Any info about Iomega (IOM)?
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
58324 47 0 IOM
Emcee:  Franco Forghieri Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
58199 "a version of Zip which may be slower but will be compatible with old flopCameron Dorey-1/15/1999
58198 Senthil: I agree that on first blush a floppy compatible Zip drive sounds goodJames Strauss-1/15/1999
58197 James & Cameron, Still i don't understand why IOM can not have a versioSenthil Sankarappan-1/15/1999
58196 Cameron: Good argument for zip staying its current course... Jim James Strauss-1/15/1999
58195 "Imagine if IOM made a Zip drive that was also floppy compatible..." Cameron Dorey-1/15/1999
58194 Tom: I agree that 1.44 meg floppies will be phased out... But in the interim, James Strauss-1/15/1999
58193 James, That assumes if anybody really needs or cares about the 1.44 megabyte fTom Trawinski-1/15/1999
58192 Tom: Thanks for the Zip drive article... Imagine if IOM made a Zip drive that James Strauss-1/15/1999
58191 USB Zip review cnet.comTom Trawinski-1/15/1999
58190 Jonathan: Sorry about your SYQT loss... You've gotten good advice about caJames Strauss-1/14/1999
58189 Jonathan, I am certainly not a tax expert, but it is my understanding that unlMel Boreham-1/14/1999
58188 <i>Would you say it is an absolute one hundred percent probability that tDavid Colvin-1/14/1999
58187 Thank you for your very detailed response about my Syquest shares. Would you sJonathan S. Feingold-1/14/1999
58186 <i>Shouldn't I be able to declare up to a $ 3,000 tax loss for the woDavid Colvin-1/13/1999
58185 Thank you for your honest opionion. I bought the Syquest shares in 1998 and thJonathan S. Feingold-1/13/1999
58184 Jonathan, I only wish there was some sort of way to get something back from youMel Boreham-1/13/1999
58183 I assume from reading this news about Iomega buying Syquest's assets, that Jonathan S. Feingold-1/13/1999
58182 Re: SYQT sale This is a fantastic deal for IOM and its shareholders. IOM now Bill Fischofer-1/13/1999
58181 Alan, here is what Syquest is saying about the sale of assets... Mel Related Mel Boreham-1/13/1999
58180 Alan, yes I think that it is an overall plus to get the intellectual property oMel Boreham-1/13/1999
58179 Mel, Nine million dollars seems like a small price to pay to have one less comAlan Rosen-1/13/1999
58178 Jeff, Interesting proposition... but not sure how this will play out regarding Mel Boreham-1/13/1999
58177 Yeah, I saw that Mel. I too hope the street receives it well, but SEG smoked eJeff Sheeran-1/13/1999
58176 Jeff, here is the news on Iomega buyout of Syquest intellectual properties and Mel Boreham-1/13/1999
58175 I heard it mentioned on CNBC Thursday morning. Thought they said HMT but I am nChris J. Addison-1/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News