SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Any info about Iomega (IOM)?
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
58324 47 0 IOM
Emcee:  Franco Forghieri Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
58224 RR has been shown to be a liar in the past. Many of post by RR are half trutThomas L Nielsen-1/26/1999
58223 Rocky - Why did you post the following on the Motley Fool Iomega message boardCogito-1/26/1999
58222 To all: I don't give a rats behind what the idiots on Wall Street did todayzalesky-1/22/1999
58221 From article in Street.com *Iomega insanity: So, Iomega's (IOM:NYSE) stockmick-1/22/1999
58220 What the heck is going on? If we beat expectations, and we have a proper plan Moez-1/22/1999
58219 Looks like they beat the consensus by 2 cents, although they were 8% below lastArnieC-1/21/1999
58218 I think predicted was .04 and they came it at .07 Doug Meetmer-1/21/1999
58217 To anyone: Great news. How much did they beat the number by??? zalesky-1/21/1999
58216 IOM at the $10 resistence level again. If it closes above $10 on high volume tBobo Bear-1/21/1999
58215 why would any progressive company want to carry along the bagage of outdated teballoonman-1/18/1999
58214 Charles, I like my numbers better also. *g* Thanks for posting the Yahoo! liDavid Colvin-1/17/1999
58213 David, This is a public source that shows the same numbers that I posted. biz.go4it-1/17/1999
58212 Cameron In today's CompUSA flyer, Orlando, front page, NEC system Zebedee Wright, Jr.-1/17/1999
58211 <i>I show EPS for 1998 as -0.07, -0.13 and -0.03 respectively for the quaDavid Colvin-1/17/1999
58210 Charles, all - H&Q's reiterated earnings estimate for Q4 1998 is .05. Cogito-1/17/1999
58209 David, Do I have bad information? I show EPS for 1998 as -0.07, -0.13 and -0.go4it-1/17/1999
58208 <i> What do you make of that -.17 earnings prediction you posted!Glenn D. Rudolph-1/17/1999
58207 I know I am fairly new to the thread but, I have been screaming .11 for two weedavedb-1/17/1999
58206 Mike, H&Q is one of two underwriters (the other one was J. P. Morgan) thatDavid Colvin-1/17/1999
58205 Glenn: What do you make of that -.17 earnings prediction you posted! Why &Mike Perras-1/17/1999
58204 All - I'm back, I'm browned and ready to get down. I'm glad to seCogito-1/17/1999
58203 Well since they've got "reiterated" out of the way and basically HardMoney-1/16/1999
58202 IOM: HAMBRECHT&QUIST has reiterated estimate for fiscal year endingGlenn D. Rudolph-1/16/1999
58201 Cameron... Not being a drive expert, I have a feeling the 120/1.44 drive probabBeachBum-1/15/1999
58200 <i>With floppy compatibility Zip would grab a larger share of the transitDavid Colvin-1/15/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News