SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Red Hat Software Inc. (Nasdq-RHAT)
An SI Board Since June 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1794 110 0 RHAT
Emcee:  Mohan Marette Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
594 Kim, I agree that mm's usually just show 100 on l2 and refresh as much as tRobbRacer-8/16/1999
593 This Stock will be 55.00 next week. Trade at 60.00 in a month and eventually tPenny Stock Trader-8/16/1999
592 The average trade shares size <250 does not indicate anything. Ever since thKimberly Lee-8/16/1999
591 Regarding the affinity shares. I cannot agree that the majority of the shares wRobbRacer-8/16/1999
590 Split time. Does any one know how many shares are authorized? Is there room forJohn Chapman-8/16/1999
589 It doesn't matter what you think or what I think, but right now the market,Kimberly Lee-8/16/1999
588 After speaking to friends at Etrade and several RBAT affinity members, it appeaKimberly Lee-8/16/1999
587 <I>I just found this thread, and I'm so glad for an outlet for some iEric Sandeen-8/16/1999
586 <I>If I am a big company, and has been using MS NT for sometime now and aEric Sandeen-8/16/1999
585 <I>The affinity shares (about 800,000) were not available for sale until Eric Sandeen-8/16/1999
584 Kim, Sorry and good luck KENNETH DOAN-8/16/1999
583 Excellent post Robb!! Nice to see someone pointing out the "actual" mrealmoney-8/16/1999
582 Kim, RBAK has much less in the float (2.5 million) and even after it has run toRobbRacer-8/15/1999
581 Mshat- I've owned AOL since 95. Totaly different deal here. RHAt does not oRobbRacer-8/15/1999
580 James Cramer, placing RHAT in the same category as RBAK and JNPR, is highly bulKimberly Lee-8/15/1999
579 You sound a lot like me whining about AOL in 1994. Netscape in 95, etc, etc. Pink Minion-8/15/1999
578 I cannot beleive people would consider buying this stock at this price. For thoRobbRacer-8/15/1999
577 <i><<Microsoft has a big bulls eye on it's belly Yes, Pink Minion-8/15/1999
576 Kenneth, no, you aren't budding in. From the very beginning, several weeks Kimberly Lee-8/15/1999
575 Someone who graduated Kindergarten should have no problem with what I was sayinPashaBear-8/15/1999
574 Thanks, Kenneth - my discipline with "hot" IPO kinds of stocks is to PashaBear-8/15/1999
573 <i>Sorry to bud in. But this is my reasoning for RHAT business, even if LPink Minion-8/15/1999
572 MS will market whatever makes the most money. timers-8/15/1999
571 <i> How is it a joke? If Linux were such a threat and so profitable then Pink Minion-8/15/1999
570 BOB BRINKER National Radio show just trashed RHAT stock valuation. Trashed it timers-8/15/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):