SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Classic SI Customization Option
An SI Board Since December 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
644 33 0
Emcee:  Silicon Investor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
594 Let me know if you need a step by step...Jorj X Mckie-2/28/2000
593 JXM, Just testing this myself right now to see what you mean. EDIT: I see whaBryanB-2/28/2000
592 Bryan, Here is another little navigation thing. When a message has been posted Jorj X Mckie-2/28/2000
591 <i>Too bad GNET didn't figure this out a year ago and address this fuAugustWest-2/27/2000
590 I see your point, now that I think about I had a terrible time with slow bookmaSnowshoe-2/27/2000
589 Greg, you're missing the point. And sorry, cable is not an option for a loAugustWest-2/27/2000
588 THis is total B.S Bryan, see below. I click on my folders, and I can't eveAugustWest-2/27/2000
587 Only about 50, but they all come up at once after about 2-3 seconds. I highly Snowshoe-2/27/2000
586 There's a customization option that lets you specify whether or not threadsSnowshoe-2/27/2000
585 How many subjectmarks do you have? I have over 100 and can see a difference. AnCatLady-2/27/2000
584 <i>But none of the page is readable until all of the subject marks have cMark Marcellus-2/27/2000
583 I have a cable modem and my SubjectMarks are loading just fine.Snowshoe-2/27/2000
582 But none of the page is readable until all of the subject marks have come over CatLady-2/27/2000
581 <i>It took about three minutes for my "subjects" page to load, Mark Marcellus-2/27/2000
580 bryan, it's been about 6 months, a little more since you first rolled out GAugustWest-2/27/2000
579Subject 33646c.horn-2/27/2000
578 Is the URL below still the location of the new Classic SI? siliconinvestor.comJustin C-2/27/2000
577 I hate the new SI; the fonts have less weight and are harder to read. All my sJGoren-2/27/2000
576 #Subject-33646c.horn-2/27/2000
575 You are absolutely right! I am so glad we had this little time out. I have bewlcnyc-2/27/2000
574 If I understand what you are asking, I believe it is related to the fact that yCisco-2/27/2000
573 As long as I have your attention, tell me something.... Doesn't it bother wlcnyc-2/27/2000
572 Since it is the only URL on New SI that works tonight, I thought I would post iCisco-2/26/2000
571 Oh, I see..... Glass half full vs glass half empty sorta thing. Ok <G>wlcnyc-2/26/2000
570 Then it worked! That is the link to the official error message for internal seCisco-2/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):