SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WDC/Sandisk Corporation
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
60323 408 2 WDC
Emcee:  clean86 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
59923Do you still think our chances are better than ever to get $86.50?joncon63-2/22/2016
59922It really depends on whether there are enough WDC shareholder votes against the Art Bechhoefer-2/22/2016
59921I hope Sanjay has a good Plan B up his sleeve.joncon63-2/22/2016
59920If WDC shareholders vote down the issue of stock to cover part of the cost of thArt Bechhoefer32/22/2016
59919Alken Asset Management to Vote Against Western Digital's Acquisition of SanDJCnieuwenj-2/22/2016
59918Intel gives the impression 3D Xpoint is on the verge of production and widespreaArt Bechhoefer22/22/2016
59917AMAT CC: "almost no CapEx for XPoint in our forecast".................BeenRetired12/20/2016
59916"China has been ploughing tens of billions of dollars into...chip industry&BeenRetired-2/20/2016
59915Very interesting ...What is the future of DRAM Intel Is Replacing RAM With SSD Ffranklin112/20/2016
59914Your suggestion regarding the sale of put options is ill advised for multiple reSiliconAlley-2/19/2016
59913I do not understand why you portray this as which of us is correct. I have madeSiliconAlley-2/19/2016
59912To all: Time will tell which of us is correct about the final price to be paid fArt Bechhoefer22/19/2016
59911Closing is not assured, as there are still shareholder votes to overcome. In anySiliconAlley22/18/2016
59910Where we can engage in discussion to separate facts, calculated hypotheses, and clean86-2/18/2016
59909I have no info to offer on the subject, other than concrete knowledge of the deaSiliconAlley-2/18/2016
59908I'm not saying they shouldn't talk about the prospects of the merger. Wclean8612/18/2016
59907I disagree with you, Clean. If you don't want to read about it, don't reSam22/18/2016
59906I want Art to be right, because I want my $86.50. But I am afraid SiliconAlley ijoncon63-2/18/2016
59905I have no guess as to when Unisplendour will close. I am merely seeking to deterSiliconAlley-2/18/2016
59904I think this horse is dead and continuing to kick it will result in nothing usefclean8612/18/2016
59903I respectfully disagree with this assessment. The "reasonableness" ofSiliconAlley-2/18/2016
59902How many times do we have to revisit the inherent benefits of the acquisition – clean86-2/18/2016
59901Aaaaaaghhhhhhhh! Of course fundamentals matter, because they determine if the deArt Bechhoefer22/18/2016
59900The fundamentals have nothing to do with the price Western Digital will ultimateSiliconAlley12/18/2016
59899The $86.50 price for SNDK is justified by the fundamentals; namely, that cash anArt Bechhoefer12/18/2016
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News