SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Good Investment Theses: VALUATIONS w/ FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS
An SI Board Since October 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
160 3 0
Emcee:  hoyasaxa Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
60 <i>forget handcuffs etc for the moment</i> Tsk, tsk. You're Edwarda-4/24/1999
59 Okay, down to brass tacks. The effect of a stock option (forget handcuffs etc fChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
58 You are definitely going to regret it, me bucko! So, let's cut to the chasEdwarda-4/24/1999
57 That sound like a deal! Which issue? Can we deal with one at a time? Or if not,Chuzzlewit-4/24/1999
56 Where's mph? Probably back in that haystack while your back is turned. I Edwarda-4/24/1999
55 Dearest Edwarda, a card no doubt from someone who admires your slippery ways. AChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
54 Sorry for the delay in my response. I was reading an e-mail card that just arrEdwarda-4/24/1999
53 I noticed you didn't answer the question. Besides, I publicly admitted thatChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
52 Last time I ceded to you, you rascal, you were inaccurate! You are not gettingEdwarda-4/24/1999
51 It can work the same way. You simply pay people in cash over the same period ofChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
50 I've got you pinned Edwarda! After you holler uncle on this one we can go tChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
49 <i>My dear Edwarda, why not pay these people in cash? And why not let theEdwarda-4/24/1999
48 I can squirm and wriggle with the best of them, Chuzz! Ahem. You have ignoredEdwarda-4/24/1999
47 I think that on the issue of purposely inflating earnings we disagree. There haChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
46 My dear Edwarda, why not pay these people in cash? And why not let the employeeChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
45 I don't think that the intent is to inflate earnings artificially. HoweverEdwarda-4/24/1999
44 Can we agree on one point? That the accounting for employee stock options is poChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
43 Au contraire re MSFT. One of the worrisome things about the company is that itEdwarda-4/24/1999
42 Good point Edwarda. That's one of the main reasons for given for options. BChuzzlewit-4/24/1999
41 Step back for a moment, Chuzz. You are running a very young company and reinveEdwarda-4/24/1999
40 This is the best place to start, I think. Gretchen Morgenson has written a fineChuzzlewit-4/21/1999
39 I am not really a proponent or opponent of stock options; seems to me a bit likDayuhan-4/20/1999
38 Okay, here we are. I think that maybe the proponents of stock options should goChuzzlewit-4/20/1999
37 Pssst: Edwarda, (I'm using my best come hither look), wanna talk about emplChuzzlewit-4/20/1999
36 Edwarda suggested that this topic ought to be posted here, so I am providing a Chuzzlewit-4/12/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):