SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
MKII
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
834 2 0 MKII
Emcee:  Amir Feinsilber Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
609 well i bet who ever it was there pi**** off that was 625,000 shares or 1,250,00mulla711-1/22/1999
608 Wow was it any of us that took that hit? Zbyte-1/22/1999
607 if its 1 for 100 = .00375 x .00875 pre split.....that was 12,500k at bid......mmulla711-1/22/1999
606 Bankruptcy Mark my words. Whether or not there is halting of trading, we willDoctorgreenback-1/22/1999
605 Wouldn't that be 1/100 The company stated 1 for 100 so that last trade wasDoctorgreenback-1/22/1999
604 TAX selling my A** some insider knew what was coming and they were unloading shmulla711-1/22/1999
603 well shares are worth now pre split..... 1 for 50 = 3/8 X 7/8 = (.0075 X .0175)mulla711-1/22/1999
602 I just recieved this post in the mail from a non member of the SI, we of courseZbyte-1/22/1999
601 THE ONLY THING I WANT IS BLOOD, BLOOD, BLOOD, FROM PAUL SMITH. ===============Elio Madama-1/22/1999
600 In addition to the NASD and the SEC, state securities regulators oversee the semulla711-1/22/1999
599 I don't own this stock, but my suggestion would be for one of you to call tMoneyBaggs-1/22/1999
598 Major BS Then it was 1-50, why are they telling us 1-100????????? Dilbert-1/22/1999
597 sorry to hear i put an order to sell at 2.00 cause it should have opened at 2.1mulla711-1/22/1999
596 Well just for your information, yesterday morning before the open I put an ordeZbyte-1/22/1999
595 should have been 5.00 dilbert 100 X .05 = 5.00 ..... mulla711mulla711-1/22/1999
594 1-50 Why if the R/S was 1-100 would the first ask that showed up have been $2.2Dilbert-1/22/1999
593 4-5 weeks for a non reporting co is plenty of time to screw us more and be gonemulla711-1/22/1999
592 well when lets see it in ****writing***** or pr otherwise they can tell us anytmulla711-1/22/1999
591 1-100...1-50 ? What about that OTC daily list? otcbb.com (1-50 R/S) Do the MMsDilbert-1/22/1999
590 Well we will see Paul is the Owner he may be really screwed up. Zbyte-1/22/1999
589 How can it be 1 to 100 when they registered for a 1 to 50? Someone on the threMoneyBaggs-1/22/1999
588 ok start faxing your discontent with mark 1 to there public relations dept....mulla711-1/22/1999
587 Ok folks here is the scoop, Paul called Sam this morning and gave him the low dZbyte-1/22/1999
586 Heritage Concepts International... e-mail: info@heritageconceptsintl.com PDilbert-1/22/1999
585 ok it's a new day..who has the # for at&t public relation's, kenny mulla711-1/22/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):