SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
IPIC
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1359 13 0 IPIC
Emcee:  David D. Long Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
609 Graham, Thank you for posting this article's url. Problem is that the nemargaret foley-9/2/1997
608 Physician finds errors in NEJM/Mayo Report prnewswire.com GrahamGraham Marshman-9/2/1997
607 By way of comment I will simply paste an excerpt from an article I just wrote NeuroInvestment-8/30/1997
606 Great past few posts! The most recent media hype may end up boding well for ReScott Pratho-8/30/1997
605 Thank you for thee excellent post. I had erred on the side of oversimplificatioNeuroInvestment-8/30/1997
604 NI, Your first point is a good one. The second one, which dealt with the suMarshall Teitelbaum-8/29/1997
603 I'm guessing the shorts were planning on a speedy approval for Xenical. ThTrey Yon-8/29/1997
602 ican, Thanks for the welcome. Not really involved with IPIC at this time otheMarshall Teitelbaum-8/29/1997
601 I doubt that Roche knows. The likelihood is that both obesity drugs awaiting FDNeuroInvestment-8/29/1997
600 "how many months delay you think this may cause Roche?" I do not knoTodd D. Wiener-8/29/1997
599 >"IPIC will languish somewhat until citicoline and/or bucindolol...&quojlib-8/29/1997
598 Thanks for posting the Xenical news from Roche. Would you care to speculate on Trey Yon-8/29/1997
597 A couple of comments in response to this and previous posts: 1) While it is posNeuroInvestment-8/29/1997
596 Hi Marshall--Its really nice to see you on this thread. I've followed your icanpickem-8/28/1997
595 Scott, Not sure this is a good comparison. There are some legitimate medical Marshall Teitelbaum-8/28/1997
594 If I remember right, millions of patients (I think 10 mill) have used Redux gloScott Pratho-8/28/1997
593 Roche to Pull FDA Application For Weight-Loss Drug Xenical Dow Jones NewswirTodd D. Wiener-8/28/1997
592 Very interesting insight. Thanks!Todd N. Weisrock-8/28/1997
591 So long as there isn't a sink-hole beneath the basement!!! IPIC has a greasds-8/28/1997
590 I sure hope the stock tanks on this news. I could use some more shares at bargaTodd N. Weisrock-8/28/1997
589 The Wall Street Journal -- August 28, 1997 Medicine: Eminent Journal UrgesTodd N. Weisrock-8/28/1997
588 This may have an impact on price until citicholin available. " Pressure Bruce S. Rabin-8/28/1997
587 I suspected this since on every attempt higher, the price was always taken backP.Prazeres-8/27/1997
586 Any idea if IPIC's news will affact PGEN its recent ipo?songw-8/27/1997
585 Paulo, I agree! The future is citicoline. Redux will just provide a revenue stScott Pratho-8/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News