Corporate Vision (CVIA) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
Corporate Vision (CVIA)

An SI Board Since February 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
6654	9	0	CVIA

Emcee: Robert Wu	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6154	Gerry, I agree with the thought about fixing the shares outstanding!!! Keith,	opey	-	7/31/1998
6153	<how bout that 52 wk range---.62 to 40.50---AW RIGHT!!!> guess I'll	Gary R. Owens	-	7/31/1998
6152	Gerry: Thank you very much for the detail explanation, base on your informatio	Leroy Chandler	-	7/31/1998
6151	how bout that 52 wk range---.62 to 40.50---<b>AW RIGHT!!!</b> Art	Art C.	-	7/31/1998
6150	If my historical memory is working, there were 150,000,000 pre-split shares ou	gerry	-	7/31/1998
6149	I wonder if jack's pissed now that he's got to start earning his money	FloridaGatorMike	-	7/30/1998
6148	it sure is hard to believe that the MM's own 1/4 of our float. but if they	buckshot	-	7/30/1998
6147	Leroy I am glad to see you back to posting, I thought we had lost you, there	K A Anderson	-	7/30/1998
6146	Leroy, I think what Gerry meant was reducing the current number of shares auth	Milk	-	7/30/1998
6145	Anyone with a bad heart, don't look at Yahoo profile of CVIA: biz.yahoo.com	Gary R. Owens	-	7/30/1998
6144	Mr. Gerry: Will you please give us an example (detail) of "reversing the	Leroy Chandler	-	7/30/1998
6143	Thanks for stating it much more eloquently than I. -Ken-	Kenny Low	-	7/30/1998
6142	Thanks Jill, We now have current price & volume. JC	JCinTC	-	7/30/1998
6141	I agree. A reverse split is in itself neutral. What makes a reverse split ne	gerry	-	7/30/1998
6140	I believe what got most of us shareholders upset more that the reverse split wa	Kenny Low	-	7/30/1998
6139	Excellent! Excellent! Hard to do, but in everyone's best interest. Well	Jim Armstrong	-	7/30/1998
6138	Leroy, I know why WE were in the law suit, I too was a part of it. If we are	opey	-	7/30/1998
6137	Thanks George. I think he was just on someone else's puter. Hey.....The re	D LEE	-	7/30/1998
6136	Keith, I use the term dump because someone sold at a post split price of .002	opey	-	7/30/1998
6135	Opey: The main reason for the law suit, is because we refuse to accept the re	Leroy Chandler	-	7/30/1998
6134	KAA, Can you confirm the float at 390,000ish shares? And, what's the curre	campe	-	7/30/1998
6133	opey these shares were not dumps... they were buys! Very odd indeed. I am think	K A Anderson	-	7/30/1998
6132	Why is the price up?	flash	-	7/30/1998
6131	Absolutely, but with new regs. coming along and the SEC taking more interest in	grw5	-	7/30/1998
6130	Kenny, I'm with you..........I sure as heck would like to know who or whom	opey	-	7/30/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):