SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6194 <i>again, for me ibm's growth strategy is not visible.</i> GivGeorge W Daly, Jr.-2/19/2000
6193 jonathan, thanks for the information. for me i cannot understand that behaviourandreas fauler-2/19/2000
6192 <i>Buybacks are usually good; exudes management confidence.</i> IfJonathan Edwards-2/18/2000
6191 Buybacks are usually good; exudes management confidence. Hope it's not oveDuncan Lestina-2/18/2000
6190 The consolidated statement of stockholders' equity in the annual report shoJonathan Edwards-2/18/2000
6189 hi jonahan, are you sure, they are buying back stocks in a big way? is that goandreas fauler-2/18/2000
6188 <i>p.s. i'm wondering what they are doing with their billions and bilJonathan Edwards-2/18/2000
6187 the "techs" are growing fast in fastgrowing markets, while this one iandreas fauler-2/18/2000
6186 Why is this stock such a dog relative to the techs? Something's wrong.Duncan Lestina-2/17/2000
6185 Thank you kindly, YaacovYaacov-2/17/2000
6184 very few sells at 7/8 but i see 1300 at 13:54 ESTalruss-2/17/2000
6183 The Thread I had put in an order with my trader to sell IBM at 118 7/8. I livYaacov-2/17/2000
6182 thank you bill, i wanted to say: you're right, lou... :-) afandreas fauler-2/15/2000
6181 william, i missed one word, wanted to write you're right, lou refered the andreas fauler-2/15/2000
6180 Re: <i>First of all, I am not lou, and I have no idea what ever made you Bill Martin-2/14/2000
6179 af <i>you're lou refered the revenue decline to the y2k frozen zone William-2/14/2000
6178 Sorry I usually call anything informative an analysis. Its a habit I guess. Wthombro_99-2/14/2000
6177 I didn't see much in the way of analysis in that article. JMHO. Charles Tutt-2/14/2000
6176 william, you're lou refered the revenue decline to the y2k frozen zone of tandreas fauler-2/14/2000
6175 Dave, if I only knew! However, I am still sticking with my original predictionJim Koch-2/13/2000
6174 Actually, I think some of the "fixes" that were employed for Y2K coulCharles Tutt-2/13/2000
6173 af - <i>'m asking these questions because ibm didn't manage to William-2/13/2000
6172 Win2000 and trends in general- It's happening more slowly thatn I thought,WebDrone-2/13/2000
6171 hello thread: is anybody aware on what is ibm's strategy in ebusiness? meanandreas fauler-2/13/2000
6170 Question to the thread in general: Let's say all this talk about a slow, veDon Hurst-2/12/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News