SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
All About Sun Microsystems
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
64865 326 0 JAVA
Emcee:  Carmine Cammarosano Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
63115sun micro has not had an up day since the buyout of that little tape company...cfimx-6/7/2005
63114league of extraordinary gentlemencfimx-6/7/2005
63113<i>the real story is sun micro and when the loeg is going to realize that QwikSand-6/7/2005
63112Thanks ----later will feed back. mjMJ-6/7/2005
63111this whole thing is SO overrated...its a chip...faiap invisibile to the applianccfimx-6/7/2005
63110Market share changes for Apple are taking care of themselves, and would have anyQwikSand-6/7/2005
63109that may happen as soon as it gets on macs for awhile - following the path of iTshlurker-6/7/2005
63108this is a good move by jobs but I don't think its going to amount to much macfimx-6/7/2005
63107<i>Many of us would like to be in leading edge technology that suceeds----Elroy-6/7/2005
63106I'm sure many people on this thread have watched computer executives stand uQwikSand-6/6/2005
63105Elroy Many of us would like to be in leading edge technology that suceeds-----wMJ-6/6/2005
63104Mark, I would recommend you invest your money elsewhere. You know, pick a leadiElroy-6/6/2005
63103I had owned SUNW for a long time and it hasn't gone anywhere for a long timecathy623-6/6/2005
63102Re Andy Bechtolsheim, I haven't seen anything new. His presence at Sun is aMark O. Halverson-6/6/2005
63101So after a deal that only makes sense to our deep-thinking Scotty, are we down tupanddown-6/6/2005
63100I agree with you, the deal makes no sense. I don't think there was anythingMark O. Halverson-6/6/2005
63099From the evidence, you're probably right. Nonetheless I would like to learnMark O. Halverson-6/6/2005
63098Shareholders should get Icahn the guy who took over the Blockbuster board of dirLuce Wildebeest-6/6/2005
63097Could SUNW be better positioning itself for a future sale to IBM/HPQ/Whoever? TElroy-6/6/2005
63096has he "proven" he knows more given his record since the bubble burst?cfimx-6/6/2005
63095My initial head scratching at the STK acquisition has, after consideration, giveMark O. Halverson-6/6/2005
63094the market is coming to terms with the fact that sun micro is a long long way frcfimx-6/6/2005
63093who are you kidding? are you saying they aren't capable of making an error wcfimx-6/6/2005
63092stumps me too. wasn't this was a start up company a few years back.. think John Carragher-6/6/2005
63091The decision certainly stumps me. Maybe Scott feels Storage Tec can be a cash cJDN-6/6/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News