SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
All About Sun Microsystems
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
64865 326 0 JAVA
Emcee:  Carmine Cammarosano Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
64315Off topic from Sunw. Typically, when a company is run badly, reverse split can Arthur Tang-8/24/2007
64314<i>Stock value is how hard you can fall.</i> Do you often hear the Don Green-8/24/2007
64313You guys have it all wrong. They are now going to be acquired by SBUX for the stAl Cern-8/24/2007
64312that's next.cfimx-8/24/2007
64311not similar at all. I didn't change my name to a product that never made a Dcfimx-8/24/2007
64310Arthur finally finds someone who can understand his/her/its musings...Dinesh-8/24/2007
64309I work with market makers, so you know how they talk. 'Take out the weak hanArthur Tang-8/24/2007
64308I agree, I cant recall an instance where a reverse stock split turned out good fJDN-8/24/2007
64307Stock value is how hard you can fall. Reverse split only makes the stock fall haArthur Tang-8/24/2007
64306A 5:1 reverse split is not a bad idea. Nortel did a 10:1 when its stock price gMark O. Halverson-8/23/2007
64305I wish they would also do some sort of reverse split along the way. May be 1:5 oDinesh-8/23/2007
64304It's hilarious. Also a little hard to believe. I wonder if there's heatQwikSand-8/23/2007
64303Well, sunw closed up .07 today, maybe that was from the symbol change. It couldMark O. Halverson-8/23/2007
64302<I>Kinda like changing one's handle to "benditlikebuffett" frkral-8/23/2007
64301Kinda like changing one's handle to "benditlikebuffett" from "Charles Tutt-8/23/2007
64300the solution to sun micros problems is just change the ticker symbol and all wilcfimx-8/23/2007
64299The deals were started by Novl. Ron knows IBM well and needed Websphere(special Arthur Tang-8/21/2007
64298I am with the market here on Both deals. where is the beef?cfimx-8/20/2007
64297Right now, the market is digesting the Feds' decision to lower overnight disArthur Tang-8/20/2007
64296It's not clear how much money (if any) Sun gets directly from that. They maCharles Tutt-8/19/2007
64295On 8/15 Google started to distribute Sun office software, and on 8/16 IBM initiaMark O. Halverson-8/19/2007
64294Sorry for the delay, but it had to take some research to write a reply. Sunw soArthur Tang-8/13/2007
64293Probably, but I don't have any new money right now.Charles Tutt-8/13/2007
64292It seems from a technical analysis point of view, SUNW is a buy. What does everyamoezzi-8/12/2007
64291Growing doesn't necessarily mean increasing headcount. In fact, one of the Charles Tutt-8/9/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):