QUANTUM | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
QUANTUM

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
9124	27	0	QNTM

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
6599	Sankar, thanks. Even I lost >20% in two days in qntm, no complain. I'v	james	-	12/11/1997
6598	sankar: in the cc yesterday, qntm said that, in fact, the asian situation has	BroSnack	-	12/11/1997
6597	James: This is again another point of success for the smart young Harvard-Stan	Rational	-	12/11/1997
6596	Sankar, does qntm hedge against currency changes? Since its bottom line is so m	james	-	12/11/1997
6595	John, << Corrective actions may be under way for the US companies bu	Rational	-	12/11/1997
6594	I love when the number of bears goes up on a thread. Must mean the stock will	jkb	-	12/11/1997
6593	Cruiser: One other thing you forgot to mention. It might go up when all you sh	Dale J.	-	12/11/1997
6592	RE: "open 17 7/8" I didn't exactly predict it but people were la	Tom Cruiser	-	12/11/1997
6591	<< Trust me, the analysts in on the call are not that bright - th	jkb	-	12/11/1997
6590	<<Bear Sterns still see's QNTM up to $40+>> That's nothing	jkb	-	12/11/1997
6589	> but what a bargain we're looking at! Well, perhaps. Personally I pic	Fridrik Skulason	-	12/11/1997
6588	Am I the only one here breathing a sigh of relief. I feel really good with QNT	William, III	-	12/11/1997
6587	<b>Good bullish close thanks to bargain hunters. I think it could sell of	Webb B Blackman Jr	-	12/11/1997
6586	Re: QNTM Mike, FWIW, I follow the WDC board: The tenor there is that QNTM is	Thomas Haegin	-	12/11/1997
6585	I agreee somewhat -- immediately before 1997 QNTM was a mess. That was basical	still learning	-	12/11/1997
6584	Corrective actions may be under way for the US companies but what about the Ja	John A. Shaffer	-	12/11/1997
6583	Fund Watch Features: Notebook: Quantum Pains Value Pack; Giftrust Suffers; Web	Dale J.	-	12/11/1997
6582	> I think the opening will be the low for the day, from massive > sell or	Y. Samuel Arai	-	12/11/1997
6581	I don't think anyone "knows what the future holds" with regard to	jgercke	-	12/11/1997
6580	Congrats, your guess was much better than mine Good luck	Jurgen	-	12/11/1997
6579	QNTM's made all the right moves this year but BEFORE 1997, this company wa	AJ Berger	-	12/11/1997
6578	I guess you could say feeling. There has been too many reductions in estimated	John A. Shaffer	-	12/11/1997
6577	<b>A word of caution</b> John, A good point, but what is your sta	Webb B Blackman Jr	-	12/11/1997
6576	I would be VERRY surprised if QNTM, with a conservative management and a histor	still learning	-	12/11/1997
6575	The one thing that concerns me is that it doesn't look like the DD companie	John A. Shaffer	-	12/11/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):