SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Emulex, What Prospects?
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
788 52 0 EMLX
Emcee:  Clive Miller Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
663Did you think it was a hoax? Can't believe you'd be buying if you didn&#James Burke-8/27/2000
662I bought at 72 1/4 at 10:21 and 49 1/16 at 10:26. Both limit orders were filled s-words-8/27/2000
661Well guys, after what happened to EMLX last Friday ..... I think most of you arChrisJP-8/27/2000
660:o)freeus-8/27/2000
659CA the welcome state for trapeze artists.... Labrador, What was Dr.Learys mottEddy Blinker-8/27/2000
658not to butt in (but) it is a damn good thing that the important in the know folkD.Austin-8/27/2000
657LOL...Clinton has sure taken that to the n-th degree. He just pulled off (no puWTMHouston-8/27/2000
656Another problem is that EMLX is located in California. So the bogus release comLabrador-8/27/2000
655<<OK, the FACTS, eddy, the facts. EMLX is a 3.8 BILLION (with a "B&quEddy Blinker-8/27/2000
654In deference to daddies_monie, his post was at 9:46. Bogus news released at 9:30Mr.G-8/27/2000
653WOW, so much for a sleepy Friday to end the week. Here is how "we" plSharck-8/27/2000
652freeus wrote: <i>That's the statement of the day. Isn't the entirBruce Brown-8/27/2000
651Ron, I had an ordered all set at 45, but when I placed it...BOOM HALTED. I was Deeber-8/27/2000
650Eddy, the foolishness of your comments make me laugh. I'm not sure if itPeter V-8/27/2000
649The MARKET MAKERS were the only REAL winners here as they bought a ton of sharesDeeber-8/27/2000
648By the time I caught the news and found it was a hoax the stock was already haltReturn to Sender-8/27/2000
647Evening Jason, Re your comment <i>do your best to move on... take the stojjkirk-8/27/2000
646Excusing my ignorance of the law for a moment... a stop loss in my opinion is juchangedmyname-8/27/2000
645James, I wouldn't "log on" to see EMLX down 40. I do this full tichangedmyname-8/26/2000
644Sorry Jack... the A@P site has my RT call in chat on the EMLX buy... No need fchangedmyname-8/26/2000
643Good points: But what about the Widows Mutual Fund which had a stop loss which HoyaBob-8/26/2000
642InfoStream, Re: the following statement: >>"what happened with thosechangedmyname-8/26/2000
641Yes, speaking out of ignorance, I think the reporting services have responsibiliKevin McKenzie-8/26/2000
640I find this newsletter interesting: <b>The Wall Street Digest Hotline UpdVendit™-8/26/2000
639<i>Did anyone buy EMLX before the halt? </i> I bought in May and soJack Hartmann-8/26/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News