SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
QUANTUM
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9124 27 0 QNTM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6749 In a price war, it seems Quantum should have a substantial competitve advantageZ Analyzer-12/15/1997
6748 You mentioned that this presumed debt offering would be a conventional bond, whFrodo Baxter-12/15/1997
6747 When a company is considering coming to market it is common for a broker to solJeff Egg-12/14/1997
6746 I had led this current broker to QNTM in the mid twenties, and he in turn has lJeff Egg-12/14/1997
6745 Jeff: <<"offering" if it is in the market. How can an offeriRational-12/14/1997
6744 Jeff: If you are saying that offering new debt is bullish, I tend to agree witRational-12/14/1997
6743 That is my read. I felt it would be a positive for the company as it increasesJeff Egg-12/14/1997
6742 Keep in mind that many very strong companies borrow money. If you are borrowinJeff Egg-12/14/1997
6741 My thoughts would mirror yours that it would be a positive for a company to havJeff Egg-12/14/1997
6740 Sankar and all, does anyone know how the NAZ futures correlate with the NAZGottfried-12/14/1997
6739 Gottfried: Thanks for your appreciation. There is a mention of QNTM in this wRational-12/14/1997
6738 Sankar, no need for you to answer, since your area of expertise is different. IGottfried-12/14/1997
6737 Stitch, re ><i>I am climbing back on shortly after the New Year.</iGottfried-12/14/1997
6736 Stitch, thank you for your reply - especially since all of it is true. Yet, I hGottfried-12/14/1997
6735 Stitch: There is no need to apologize, especially given the fact that you addrRational-12/14/1997
6734 Rob: <<Then if the Asian mfgs. Maxtor, Samsung, and fujitsu adobt rationRational-12/14/1997
6733 With apologies to Sankar I will also reply re: barriers There are two huge barStitch-12/14/1997
6732 Hello Sankar & Alan, Sankar, I could not agree with you more..that innovatStitch-12/14/1997
6731 Gottfried, thanks for the informative post. I think the long-term growth trendRob S.-12/14/1997
6730 One factor that becomes increasingly important to OEMs as ASPs for PCs decreaseRob S.-12/14/1997
6729 The article has a lot of truth to it but ignores a discussion about how the marRob S.-12/14/1997
6728 Sankar, below please see my notes from a June '97 talk by Jim Porter. He doGottfried-12/14/1997
6727 Sankar, a question: you said ><i>I suppose QNTM, SEG and IBM have innoGottfried-12/14/1997
6726 Hi Alan: << Did you know for instance that last fiscal year the top 30 Rational-12/14/1997
6725 JG: <<Biggest risk seems to me is weak yen and Asian currencies. But theRational-12/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):