SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Discuss Year 2000 Issues
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9818 28 0
Emcee:  C.K. Houston Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
6793 <the 2 movies that Hollywood was working on about Y2K?> The last I heardKen-7/20/1999
6792 Oh, please Cheeke, more Rat articles! Please oh please! Espically any with thesKen-7/20/1999
6791 When will the panic start- Anybody heard or seen anything lately on the 2 movi$Bill-7/20/1999
6790 Here's some real "poll data" (v. conjecture on your part as to whflatsville-7/20/1999
6789orlandosentinel.com People may lie about age, money and sex, but one of the bigflatsville-7/20/1999
6788 I'm in a far better position to understand the consensus of opinion on Y2K Technologyguy-7/20/1999
6787 >>><i>It's a piece of data that, whether you accept it or noflatsville-7/20/1999
6786 I take comfort from the article. The regulation of the nuclear industry in theTechnologyguy-7/20/1999
6785 Thanks for posting, Ken. This quote from the report to Congress, I think is parTechnologyguy-7/20/1999
6784 No, Cheeky posted to the right thread: Y2K Impact on Stock Market & SocietTechnologyguy-7/20/1999
6783 If you find it a waste of time to respond to someone, then don't!!! WhenevForYourEyesOnly-7/20/1999
6782 Bald Eagle: here are some excellent articles and links re:generators: hope theyKen-7/20/1999
6781 <b>Banks Cheer Proposed Fed Y2K Facility, Want Lower Rate</b> <iC.K. Houston-7/19/1999
6780 <<i>Computerworld is a far more reliable source then many of the otherC.K. Houston-7/19/1999
6779 Cheky,argue with this Sheriff<<Sheriff Sees the Future, Taking Action Ken-7/19/1999
6778 Chee kee Kid, <<i>Don't you find it interesting how the Y too KayC.K. Houston-7/19/1999
6777 Don't you find it interesting how the Y too Kay paranoia grows in spite of Cheeky Kid-7/19/1999
6776 No sense posting there.. Everybody else knows that the whole thing is a "SJim-7/19/1999
6775 MUST READ:United States Senate Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology PrKen-7/19/1999
6774 How to know when the panic will begin...kinda...CBS News poll... After the stoKen-7/19/1999
6773 Wrong thread. Post here: 2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud&quflatsville-7/19/1999
6772 Daily Fix: Preparation now July 19, 1999 zdnet.com <i>>>A year aCheeky Kid-7/19/1999
6771 <rude comment from John.,roomfor civilized dialogue> Sure T,YOU start it,Ken-7/19/1999
6770 Re This rude comment, of course, from John Hi Technology Guy, Sorry, but I trJohn Hunt-7/19/1999
6769 <rude comment from John.,roomfor civilized dialogue> Sure T,YOU start it,Ken-7/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News