SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7033I am glad we agree on that point. The relativity one (being conservative as mysjlallen-4/5/2002
7032I set out clear criteria. I was on the right side of the criteria......Neocon-4/5/2002
7031To me, too.E-4/5/2002
7030It was supposed to be an attack "according to my definition". I defineNeocon-4/5/2002
7029Relativity is at the heart of the matterepicure-4/5/2002
7028LOL! The very idea of you "attacking" anyone is immensely amusing as jlallen-4/5/2002
7027<i>I did not attack anyone....... </i> Hmmmm. Where have I heard tLane3-4/5/2002
7026I know. You gave them a little <i>poke</i> in the rectory. Which asE-4/5/2002
7025context is so often relative to the observer I suppose we each looked at this diepicure-4/5/2002
7024You are begging the question. I did not attack anyone.......Neocon-4/5/2002
7023Of course it's not a reason to abandon attempts to establish criteria. But E-4/5/2002
7022By the way, it was not, by my definition, an attack, and I explained why: 1. theNeocon-4/5/2002
7021I do not see anything. The possibility of disagreement over a particular case isNeocon-4/5/2002
7020Tucson, Arizona Friday, 5 April 2002 Networks abandoned news values for ratiLane3-4/5/2002
7019I quoted it correctly (lest someone reading your alternative quote not understanE-4/5/2002
7018Interesting. If I had said that "intelligent liberals...became neoconservatNeocon-4/5/2002
7017It almost does. It feels inspiring, somehow. As though the lioness was a pacifisE-4/5/2002
7016<I think that intelligent liberals, seeing the peril of the West, mostly becaE-4/5/2002
7015I have a soft spot for the song.Neocon-4/5/2002
7014It is certainly an important element.....Neocon-4/5/2002
7013Glad to be of service.....Neocon-4/5/2002
7012I will consider which specifics might be best addressed in this context, and getNeocon-4/5/2002
7011Not at all. I agree with John Stuart Mill that it is better to have two parties,Neocon-4/5/2002
7010<i>I have now reviewed last nights posts.</i> Is that all there is,Lane3-4/5/2002
7009No problem, the issue can be examined in the complete absence of information, hemarcos-4/5/2002
7008Western civilization is more or less the civilization that sprung up around the Neocon-4/5/2002
7007<i>'It's illegal to have sex with a porcupine in Florida</i>Lane3-4/5/2002
7006I wonder wonder wonder wonder who who wrote the book of Mormon - exmormon.org &marcos-4/5/2002
7005<i>However, the most important aspect of conservatism, IMO, is that we accLane3-4/5/2002
7004Interesting take on the subject. I agree with many of your points. However, thjlallen-4/5/2002
7003<i>Specifics, Neo ... how does all this apply to the issues of the day <Lane3-4/5/2002
7002Drat! Nice grub (she said, grudgingly)Poet-4/5/2002
7001Thank you, Neo. I appreciate that.Poet-4/5/2002
7000Specifics, Neo ... how does all this apply to the issues of the day ... softwoodmarcos-4/5/2002
6999I thought the context of response would be clarifying, but perhaps not......Neocon-4/5/2002
6998I have now reviewed last nights posts. I do, indeed, understand that X and KarenNeocon-4/5/2002
6997Might not apply to common law marriages. Would probably differ from state to stjlallen-4/5/2002
6996What about common law marriages? I live in Louisiana, which I'm sure you knoBald Eagle-4/5/2002
6995No. Generally, a ministerial act (such as a marriage, notarizations/acknowledgemjlallen-4/5/2002
6994So your vision of a strong future for America includes only one political party,Poet-4/5/2002
6993I thought it was rather a pretentious commentary. Certainly intended to be diviSolon-4/5/2002
6992I couldn't tell it seemed very close to some of the statements that I think epicure-4/5/2002
6991I don't think I am under an illusion about that. The future is still up for Neocon-4/5/2002
6990RE: And if it becomes acceptable to mate with first cousins, then why not with uBald Eagle-4/5/2002
6989That is a little strange, now that you mention it.Neocon-4/5/2002
6988It was a poke at Solon and Poet for the parody, actually......Neocon-4/5/2002
6987I am glad.....Neocon-4/5/2002
6986Might be. But it was not accidental that that was the college I attended, so whoNeocon-4/5/2002
6985<I>But there were more in the '70s, before a lot of us pretty much gavPoet-4/5/2002
6984Is there anything to prevent cousins from a state where it's illegal to go tBald Eagle-4/5/2002
6983First, in the original context, I was thinking mainly about the difference betweNeocon-4/5/2002
6982What gets me is the cops get there right after the shooting and the shooter is aIsh-4/5/2002
6981ok so is this an attack or criticism of liberals? From your definition, it seemepicure-4/5/2002
6980I was poking at you two a little, in response. There are still a reasonable numbNeocon-4/5/2002
6979Well, it is the sort of thing I was trying to discuss with Karen, I guess. I thiNeocon-4/5/2002
6978There are different points of view in political conservatism. There are some whoNeocon-4/5/2002
6977One never knows, do one? -gPoet-4/5/2002
6976ok. I think I see what you mean.epicure-4/5/2002
6975To me, mating with members of one's tribe just doesn't seem to make sensPoet-4/5/2002
6974I wanted to point out the inevitability of stirring up factional anger when the Neocon-4/5/2002
697330 states prohibit marriage by first cousins. JLAjlallen-4/5/2002
6972LOL!! Maybe its the Prozac....?? <VBG> JLAjlallen-4/5/2002
6971Are you attending night classes in diplomacy these days?Poet-4/5/2002
6970RE:I think there's very good reason for the incest taboo. Well, not with coBald Eagle-4/5/2002
6969Not unintelligent. I prefer to think of most of you as well meaning but misguidjlallen-4/5/2002
6968Yes, some sort of change is inevitable, but not every sort of change, and much cNeocon-4/5/2002
6967Funny, I always thought that tradition was just one of the key aspects of what wLane3-4/5/2002
6966I'm not a liberal, nor do I understand all of their concomitant beliefs I amepicure-4/5/2002
6965I'm talking about the incest taboo, not legal stuff. I think there's vePoet-4/5/2002
6964Why don't you write an abstract for us?Lane3-4/5/2002
6963LOL! That's a good one......Neocon-4/5/2002
6962That is generally true. I think that they should exercise a little discretion, mNeocon-4/5/2002
6961As I reflect on it, that may be a good example of the extent to which we honor tLane3-4/5/2002
6960Why odd? I can do various riffs on the value of the free market for you, but thiNeocon-4/5/2002
6959It's not taboo everywhere. It's legal in some states. I think it's lBald Eagle-4/5/2002
6958sighepicure-4/5/2002
6957Wow. There goes another taboo.Poet-4/5/2002
6956<i>and what would your essay on what it means to be a liberal look like? hLane3-4/5/2002
6955Actually, the opposite of following one's bliss.....Neocon-4/5/2002
6954"At the risk of repetitiveness, again, I am not saying anything against criepicure-4/5/2002
6953You seem to be implying that there are few intelligent liberals.Poet-4/5/2002
6952As heard on CNN this ayem. Study: Marrying cousins not so risky April 4, 2002 PLane3-4/5/2002
6951At the risk of repetitiveness, again, I am not saying anything against criticismNeocon-4/5/2002
6950ok. and what would your essay on what it means to be a liberal look like? hmmm?epicure-4/5/2002
6949Actually, I think that intelligent liberals, seeing the peril of the West, mostlNeocon-4/5/2002
6948:-)Poet-4/5/2002
6947If I were writing an essay on what it means to be a conservative, I would start Lane3-4/5/2002
6946Can you describe when criticism rises to an attack (Or the difference between thepicure-4/5/2002
6945I have made it clear over and over again that I do not consider criticism the saNeocon-4/5/2002
6944No, Western Civilization is still developing. I have mentioned that there are inNeocon-4/5/2002
6943One question- I thought you were articulating your idea of what it is to be consepicure-4/5/2002
6942<i>Your attempts at humor, if that is truly what they are, are falling flaLane3-4/5/2002
6941<i>Could you tell me more specifically what troubles you? </i> My quLane3-4/5/2002
6940But others people's cherished ideals and beliefs, being quite different thanepicure-4/5/2002
6939A joke: Three friends -- a surgeon, an engineer and a politician - were discussPoet-4/5/2002
6938Thanks for the clarification. It seemed of a piece with your usual comments on sNeocon-4/5/2002
6937It's the little guys who get hassled.Ish-4/5/2002
6936LOL Solon! I love it. ;-)Poet-4/5/2002
6935My point is not to ban disagreement, which I do not consider the same as attackiNeocon-4/5/2002
6934<I>Please chill, girl. Next thing you know you'll be calling me a homoPoet-4/5/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):