SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2484 45 0 LUMM
Emcee:  Currency Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
709 Fiber: Yah, agreed. One can't go all "weak in the knees" over CJohn Curtis-9/7/1999
708 Cosmo, Of course, you are correct in that 'traditional' DWDM assemblieFrank A. Coluccio-9/7/1999
707 Just a word of caution....Csco and Intel have invested 10 million each in Lumenfibrehound*-9/7/1999
706 John, It looks like Cisco is investigating the same technology path that LUMM hCosmo Daisey-9/7/1999
705 Boxes, Racks... John, at times I've likened DWDM "devices" to rFrank A. Coluccio-9/7/1999
704 Cosmo: Hmmm...interesting. I will say this. If LUMM has been able to come upJohn Curtis-9/7/1999
703 John, I have been checking sources and have found snippets of references to CSCCosmo Daisey-9/7/1999
702 CSCO & LUMM!? I've heard the rumors, but have discounted them as just John Curtis-9/7/1999
701 John, Can you direct us to the CSCO/LUMM news? CD Cosmo Daisey-9/7/1999
700 Closing on $6 1/2!! I love stocks that go up! ;-) (eom) John Curtis-9/7/1999
699 Hi all Lumm-ites, I sold my 5k today for +1; but I continue to be intrigued witbaggo-9/3/1999
698 SL better get some help!!! The momentum is picking up rather fast. The world wiRCDTD-9/3/1999
697 Was in contact with LUMM after the close today and SL thinks that the move and Don Johnstone-9/3/1999
696 If I may pat myself on the back here.......... Picked LUMM on 2-19 at .875 alJoe Copia-9/3/1999
695 Thanks for the info, although it is disappointing. LUMM really should add an exopalapril-9/3/1999
694 <<what does LUMM own?>> I asked LUMM that question and got the genDon Johnstone-9/3/1999
693 The question remains: what does LUMM own? The patent or a license? If the latteopalapril-9/2/1999
692 <<wouldn't those rights be valid in the other signatory countries?>Don Johnstone-9/2/1999
691 This being the case, if LUMM owns the patents or the rights thereof, then underMr. E-9/2/1999
690 <<Is Canada a signatory to any patent agreements?>> Yes, Canada beDon Johnstone-9/2/1999
689 Is Canada a signatory to any patent agreements? By that, I mean that a patent rMr. E-9/2/1999
688 <<LUMM is not that gung ho about them and would rather rely on trade secropalapril-9/2/1999
687 <<why not the rest of the world ?>> Good question! I don't haDon Johnstone-9/2/1999
686 A patent to be valid, must allow a person skill in the art, to duplicate the prClaude Mathieu-9/2/1999
685 Applications are published (everything is published; formulas, details , drawinClaude Mathieu-9/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):