SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
712Seriously, Bob, getting stopped out isn't botching a trade, if that's whTechTrader42-3/12/2002
711A difficult case, for the "How's That Again?" file. "The CompTechTrader42-3/12/2002
710oh don't worry, I belong here just fine.. I botched the hell out of that lasbob wallace-3/12/2002
709You'll be unsubscribed with such astute observations on an otherwise uselessTechTrader42-3/12/2002
708Testimonial: "I've lost everything, I'm gonna sue your ass!"Sherman Chen-3/12/2002
707Yes, these are the questions we contemplate here all day long, while others are TechTrader42-3/12/2002
706wow! this topic is smokin'! haven't looked but it has probably vaulted bob wallace-3/12/2002
705almost sounds like "If a man is talking by himself, is he still wrong?"Gersh Avery-3/12/2002
704No, Gersh, because the market can move in either direction, funnily enough, regaTechTrader42-3/12/2002
703And let me say .. those 100's that I've seen have been doing a pretty goGersh Avery-3/12/2002
702Hummmm .. are you calling a top?Gersh Avery-3/12/2002
701In my view, they sure are. It means that the SPX could finally be topping out, iTechTrader42-3/12/2002
700Excellent, looks like hanging men on the SPX, RUT, and DJIA too.Sherman Chen-3/12/2002
699Aren't perfect scores a good thing? -g-Paul Shread-3/12/2002
698A surprising close: ST Naz CI: 75.630 85.714 MT Naz CI: 75.630 85.714 LT Naz CITechTrader42-3/12/2002
697Before the close: ST Naz CI: 76.050 85.714 MT Naz CI: 76.050 85.714 LT Naz CI: TechTrader42-3/12/2002
696Judging from the title alone, this might just be a good book on esteemed technicTechTrader42-3/12/2002
695Another indicator that hinted at a rally was the NYSE McClellan based on volume.TechTrader42-3/12/2002
694This is interesting. It (the divergence in the S&P) suggests the possibilityTechTrader42-3/12/2002
693There were actually hundreds of notes this weekend, but the thread's alert cTechTrader42-3/12/2002
692Thanks for the update, Brooklise. There were no posts on this thread on Mar. 9 William JH-3/12/2002
691Here are the CI's: ST Naz CI: 66.702 85.714 MT Naz CI: 66.702 85.714 LT NazTechTrader42-3/12/2002
690Here are the CI's. But first, I want to congratulate everyone on the sell siTechTrader42-3/11/2002
689We're almost there, folks: ST Naz CI: 90.231 67.752 MT Naz CI: 91.484 71.88TechTrader42-3/8/2002
688We're getting near an S&P sell signal, if the CI's close near 100. TTechTrader42-3/8/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News