SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
JMAR Technologies(JMAR)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9695 80 0 JMAR
Emcee:  James Bowser Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7120 I just got a copy of the November Conference call tape. Here are some tidbits Starlight-12/3/1998
7119 <<Why is the stock price so low?>> Considering that earnings are aMRothaus1-12/3/1998
7118 I think the new PR firm has done a great job considering all. Their spin in somRichaaard-12/3/1998
7117 Well put. Richaaard-12/3/1998
7116 Look, the credibility issue concerning management has been a key issue in the lCandle stick-12/3/1998
7115 Credibility, PR ineptness and investor belly aching, in my opinion. I realize brent gephart-12/3/1998
7114 Your right, JMAR price is low due to the lack of credibility. Everyone that hasRichaaard-12/3/1998
7113 Why wasn't that on their web site. Why aren't they tell us about thesebrent gephart-12/3/1998
7112 Found this regarding an upcoming presentation by JMAR Research scientists at a timwa-12/3/1998
7111 Chip equipment stocks are having a good day as well, because of positive commentimwa-12/3/1998
7110 Sorry, I agree absolutely. The PR firm is lacking. I talk with people all the brent gephart-12/3/1998
7109 Brent - I understand you loud and clear. My point is that these DD manufactureGinko-12/3/1998
7108 <I would like to thank everyone for the very enlightening discussion about XDave Lippert-12/3/1998
7107 <i><<IBM is Jmar's biggest customer....>></i> CorrAnaxagoras-12/3/1998
7106 If it were not for JMAR, the disk drive manufactures, especially IBM would not brent gephart-12/3/1998
7105 Bean - You're right. JMAR is <i>perceived</i> as a "disk Starlight-12/3/1998
7104 Disk-drive stocks at 52 week highs..... isn't JMAR remotely related to thisGinko-12/3/1998
7103 OK Brent, I'll bite. Why is it so low? No sarcasm, I don't have a cluFalstaff-12/3/1998
7102 I would like to thank everyone for the very enlightening discussion about XRL. brent gephart-12/2/1998
7101 I think most would agree that XRL is clearly the next step, but everything IRichaaard-12/2/1998
7100 Yes, I know about the milestone. What I don't know is if they have made anX-Ray Man-12/2/1998
7099 You asked: My understanding is JMAR is still prototyping on the old HampDale Kohler-12/2/1998
7098 This is an article from SAL's newletter, Vol. 3 #5 - 1998 (current issue). Starlight-12/2/1998
7097 Falstaff, did anyone consider that the next lithography technology may not be jBilberry-12/2/1998
7096 Great responses, thanks. I did not mean to imply that UV would go away immediaFalstaff-12/2/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):