SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Ask Vendit Off-Topic Questions
An SI Board Since May 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8752 80 0 QQQQ
Emcee:  Vendit™ Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7127BB's on the daily QQQQ still expanding .. New low for the year also ..Gersh Avery-3/29/2005
7126This ascending fork is now dead: ttrader.com These forks are still running theGersh Avery-3/29/2005
7125Since you are in below $4.00, you can probably set a stop just below the lower BWalkingshadow-3/29/2005
7124Terry I see what you mean by the BB's----sure hope so---will hold for now. MJ-3/29/2005
7123Hi MJ, WGAT has an interesting chart... the BBs are extremely contracted, and aWalkingshadow-3/29/2005
7122Enough said ----for maximizing profits---now back under 4.00 so someone took proMJ-3/29/2005
7121Good Afternoon Just checked in I see that WGAT has had a nice move in the earlyMJ-3/29/2005
7120Three days in a row of lower highs on the QQQQ lower BB still fallingGersh Avery-3/29/2005
7119You would be well advised to listen to Mr. Conservative! HURC definitely signalWalkingshadow-3/29/2005
7118The L/R charts in AskResearch are close (not identical for some reason) to thoseWalkingshadow-3/29/2005
7117Thanks, Terry. My husband (ie. Mr. Conservative) would like to thank you, too LZeddie88-3/29/2005
7116I hope that the QQQQ closes it's opening gap. edit gap closed .. we can heaGersh Avery-3/29/2005
7115have to wonder why nobody is accepting those bids at 36.31 that are floating pasGersh Avery-3/29/2005
7114MJ, Your analysis of this fork chart is correct. themarketwind.com All you reVendit™-3/29/2005
7113Stockcharts allows the user to pick the first data point and then the program alVendit™-3/29/2005
7112I am using a shorter time length with with wider outer rails here. themarketwinVendit™-3/29/2005
7111&sto1Hi JK, << <i>Because this period is transitional, the dataWalkingshadow-3/29/2005
7110Reid & Gersh et al Another way of looking at this chart------is a down fielMJ-3/28/2005
7109Reid & Terry, I think both of your charts here tell the L/R story. An obviJ.K.-3/28/2005
7108Hi Sue, I tend to get in a bit too early myself. I think in the case of HURC,Walkingshadow-3/28/2005
7107I think one thing is clear, and that is that there is a trendline above extendinWalkingshadow-3/28/2005
7106Yes, I think so. Using that rationale, the regression lines look like this: DaWalkingshadow-3/28/2005
7105I'm not sure... it makes more sense to me to begin the regression lines wherWalkingshadow-3/28/2005
7104JK 70 is the time frame in the chart below: 139.142.147.218 Is this what you Vendit™-3/28/2005
7103Thanx. I have to do a little DD later.Jill-3/28/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):