SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ASCEND 1997 : The reasons why it will descend.
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
122 1 0 ASND
Emcee:  LEUTHY Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
72 Sorry,folks,I meant Bay ,not Cascade (although considering their stock price peAntonioS-1/25/1997
71 Leuthy,I believe that focusing only on their prospective competition is not ,inAntonioS-1/25/1997
70 Dee, >> Why among these network product stocks did ASND act demonstrably LEUTHY-1/25/1997
69 Rob, Sorry I took so long to answer. I havn't followed the Canadian market michael c. peterson-1/24/1997
68 M, today was an interesting day although in the general scheme of things a singDee Jay-1/24/1997
67 U S West's !NTERPRISE Networking Deploys Ascend's IDSL.: "AscenDee Jay-1/22/1997
66 another theory (mine) is that ASND will be $41 +/- 2 or 3 by 2/15 - thanks to aDee Jay-1/22/1997
65 I stand by my statement. ASND will annouce stock split within weeks.JOHN CHEN-1/21/1997
64 Dee, just to bring a few pepper to the controversial Abstract from French MaLEUTHY-1/21/1997
63 Michael, I agree with you. I usually have dealt on the TSE. However, VSE:dbaRob Toor-1/21/1997
62 ASND is up 30% year-to-date. Where does this little fact fit into your, LEUTHY&shdu-1/20/1997
61 michael, ASND is up 30% year-to-date. Where does this little fact fit into yoSkipper-1/20/1997
60 RT, You are playing with fire at these levels.This is a sure way for you to makmichael c. peterson-1/20/1997
59 Dee Jay, I agree with that statement....Tech stocks get over sold in a down marmichael c. peterson-1/20/1997
58 Dee Jay, For the most part you're right.A lot of institutions make sure thamichael c. peterson-1/20/1997
57 Leuthy, There are so many of these bloated tech stocks. In a euphoria they willmichael c. peterson-1/20/1997
56 in the final analysis, Michael, here's what the Forbes article stated: &quoDee Jay-1/20/1997
55 Michael, that is so true. Do you trade on the VSE. I'm wondering if you hRob Toor-1/20/1997
54 I would say that M. Carter makes a solid point but Michael, it would be counterDee Jay-1/20/1997
53 Dee Jay, ASND will not escape a downturn in techs.We witness that back in july.michael c. peterson-1/20/1997
52 I think the point of the article was about overvaluation and momentum based invvegetarian-1/20/1997
51 Michael, Thank you for your post. And congratulations to Gretchen Morgenson foLEUTHY-1/20/1997
50 the article very carefully delineates reasons why *certain* high tech sectors aDee Jay-1/19/1997
49 Leuthy, I have been lurking here since you started this thread and I agree withmichael c. peterson-1/19/1997
48 Adam, you need to double check your facts - per Exodus' NOC they do have soDee Jay-1/18/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News