SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
MGI Pharma MOGN New patents, anti cancer
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1826 45 0 MOGN
Emcee:  Mark Oliver Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
726 V1, <<I am in MOGN because of Salagen.>> Salagen has a great futurDavid Cathcart-2/21/1998
725 David, I am in MOGN because of Salagen. The drug is now approved for two indicaVector1-2/21/1998
724 Eagle, <<do we have competition for 114 either on the market or in develDavid Cathcart-2/21/1998
723 david, do we have competition for 114 either on the market or in development?the eagle-2/20/1998
722 Eagle, << what the time frame for getting the drug approved if trials goDavid Cathcart-2/20/1998
721 Richard, <<I believe those of you who do not believe should wait to purcDavid Cathcart-2/20/1998
720 david, thanks very much for your post regarding new drug. do you or anyone elsethe eagle-2/20/1998
719 Astro, the abstract below is just (a recent) one out of 3000+ available in MedlPseudo Biologist-2/20/1998
718 <MGI-114 only has to work better than Taxol.> What's Taxol? Whatastro-2/20/1998
717 David Good review of MGI 114. You have present the bottom line reasons for ownseminole-2/20/1998
716 Eagle, <<give all of us some realistic view of what the prospects are foDavid Cathcart-2/19/1998
715 Man this is one spicy pepper!! <eom>astro-2/19/1998
714 since i know little about the technical aspects of mgi 114 could someone give uthe eagle-2/19/1998
713 << My short-term goal is to make Adam happy.>> I think it would beGlenn W-2/19/1998
712 Thanks for the link Richard. I've been away for the day. Did we really trDavid Cathcart-2/19/1998
711 David The big boys move in this morning. Lets watch those large trades. quickseminole-2/19/1998
710 Peter <<< It's conceivable that it works better (or at least veryseminole-2/19/1998
709 Thanks for the insights, V1. This company looks more and more impressive to meRussian Bear-2/19/1998
708 Thanks for the response, David. I am in pretty heavily, as it is, and intend tRussian Bear-2/19/1998
707 <<Do you have a good sense of Salagen's potential revenues, and the tVector1-2/18/1998
706 Richard, Here's some evidence of just how tough the MV522 lung carcinoma lBiomaven-2/18/1998
705 Bear, << One thing I am still trying to understand better is the size/prDavid Cathcart-2/18/1998
704 Eagle, <<i think that you posted some info attributable to blitzer regarDavid Cathcart-2/18/1998
703 david, i think that you posted some info attributable to blitzer regarding the the eagle-2/18/1998
702 Has anyone called MOGN Inv.Rels. to find out when they plan to make the announcadam hefian-2/18/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):