Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Silicon Investor - User Site Discussion - Generally Unmodera

An SI Board Since November 2013

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1604	78	0

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
729	I have lost track of the number of people you have called criminals. Yet you cle	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	4	1/5/2014
728	Just the opposite. The authorities do that, what SI's policies are is up to	N. Dixon	-	1/5/2014
727	So now SI admins have to be judge and jury every time someone throws out an accu	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	1/5/2014
726	IH is less likely the model than Stockhouse	Metacomet	-	1/5/2014
725	SI needs to clear out the criminals, plain and simple. ND	N. Dixon	-	1/5/2014
724	History People started whole threads to deal with the criminal naked short sell	N. Dixon	-	1/5/2014
723	About all SI has to do to avoid becoming Yahoo, is to decline to implement (or a	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	1/5/2014
722	ya'll that gripe about the newish siadmin, acting like your wants are more i	ravenseye	-	1/5/2014
721	They aspire for it to not to become Yahoo, riddled with paid boiler room people.	N. Dixon	-	1/5/2014
720	and the majority left because of the criminal element like Elgindy's group.	N. Dixon	-	1/5/2014
719	You are operating a criminal enterprise on SI. You are part of a "pump and	N. Dixon	-	1/5/2014
718	What is the vision of the site? All one has to do is look to whom the representa	greg s	-	1/5/2014
717	many of the veterans stuck around because of the sense of community, BINGO ! We	Cogito Ergo Sum	-	1/5/2014
716	Good analysis of the history ..don't necessarily agree with the new directi	Metacomet	1	1/5/2014
715	But you do not promote the site. In fact your tweets disparage SI. What kind of	Jorj X Mckie	2	1/5/2014
714	But you do not promote the site. In fact your tweets disparage SI. What kind of	N. Dixon	-	1/5/2014
713	5. What is the vision for the site a year from now and five years from now? When	Jorj X Mckie	4	1/5/2014
712	The whining was in some cases folks that paid for a lifetime long ago.. but got	Cogito Ergo Sum	3	1/4/2014
711	And isn't that a topic for the REFR board??? Liars! You know perfectly well	N. Dixon	-	1/4/2014
710	no. if you invest in a company you don't look at the investment as if it wer	N. Dixon	-	1/4/2014
709	And they aren't even turning a profit to start to whittle the mountain of re	Dale Baker	-	1/4/2014
708	OT Does REFR have NEGATIVE $87 million of "retained earnings"?	Sr K	-	1/4/2014
707	The whining began when the adds appeared and SI management was unwilling to allo	greenspirit	-	1/4/2014
706	Is ZIXI an issue now? LOL, they still have NEGATIVE $248 million of "retain	Dale Baker	-	1/4/2014
705	[graphic]	Kevin Podsiadlik	1	1/4/2014

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):