Citrix Systems (CTXS) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Citrix Systems (CTXS)

An SI Board Since April 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
9068	119	0	CTXS

Emcee: Steven Tsai	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
7643	I also looked at CTXS with a 50% growth rate and a 5% discount rate. With the	David Montgomery	-	3/9/2000
7642	Re: 25% growth rate. Citrix's eps growth rate was 58% last year and has be	David Perfette	-	3/9/2000
7641	Re: ICA Positioning in the Handheld/Palm/Mobile, etc OS Market Thread- Just a	MikeM54321	-	3/9/2000
7640	Of course, you're right. Then, of course, you can convert that 10 year rev	David Montgomery	-	3/9/2000
7639	You know that at 25% growth rate for 10 years the earnings will be 10 times wha	Sweet Ol	-	3/9/2000
7638	Dinesh - I don't know anything about TA either. I looked at the following	David Montgomery	-	3/9/2000
7637	re<i>overvalued?</i> I was expecting, when I entered CTXS last fall	freeus	-	3/9/2000
7636	Hi David How do you decide if something is overvalued in the short term ? Wou	Dinesh	-	3/9/2000
7635	Thanks for the input - personally, I think ctxs is way overvalued in the short	David Montgomery	-	3/9/2000
7634	How the heck do you value stocks today? None of my old metrics seem to bear an	Sweet Ol	-	3/8/2000
7633	Looks like the Citrix board died. Does anyone agree that this stock is WAY ove	David Montgomery	-	3/8/2000
7632	Mike, Re W2K and NT -- the former is the follow-on to NT 4.0; I believe the Int	Bill Tessaro	-	3/2/2000
7631	<i>John- I don't understand why there should be volatility? RDP is no	john99walsh	-	3/2/2000
7630	John- I don't understand why there should be volatility? RDP is nothing new	MikeM54321	-	3/2/2000
7629	Here is the latest from MSFT relating to improved thin client support for Windo	john99walsh	-	3/2/2000
7628	ORCL and CTXS will coexist because they are now both highly focussed on differe	Innuit	-	3/1/2000
7627	MikeM, I would tend to be skeptical of an Oracle announcement. The same machin	Dinesh	-	3/1/2000
7626	<i>"How big is the potential 8i slice of the total enterprise apps m	MikeM54321	-	3/1/2000
7625	MikeM, Allen Thanks for filling me in. No, I did not wade too far deep in old	Dinesh	-	3/1/2000
7624	Dinesh- We had some excellent discussions about this new Java model waaay upstr	MikeM54321	-	3/1/2000
7623	Dinesh - When discussing Java apps, we are talking about something very differ	Cogito	-	3/1/2000
7622	MikeM Can you shed some more light on the "new" Java model ? I am ve	Dinesh	-	3/1/2000
7621	Java centric thin client processed on the client always was 90% hype. While use	mauser96	-	3/1/2000
7620	<i>"I think it's tripled because the market is infatuated with a	MikeM54321	-	3/1/2000
7619	MikeM, <i>All I recall was that Oracle was trading at $12/share when the	Mike Buckley	-	3/1/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):