SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
JMAR Technologies(JMAR)
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9695 80 0 JMAR
Emcee:  James Bowser Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7720 Consider that a warrant buyer would have to see a potential of 6.00 at the miniRichaaard-4/5/1999
7719 Regarding warrants, if you are holding for a runup in JMAR to make the warrantFreedomForAll-4/5/1999
7718 JMAR Traders: Anyone have a feeling if JMAR will be back below 2 this week? IRichard N Lambert-4/5/1999
7717 FWIW... JMAR's "breakthrough" made the Corporate Report section oDave Swanson-4/4/1999
7716 I appreciate your inquiry, though I can't tell if you appreciate my commentFalstaff-4/4/1999
7715 Yes you are right about the warrants. We have the 10-K warning that first quarMRothaus1-4/4/1999
7714 Thanks again, Falstaff for your response to my gratuitous literary allusion. I Jonathan N-4/4/1999
7713 Here is an application that JMAR's soft x-ray source might be useful for. timwa-4/3/1999
7712 You appear to know more than most of us about JMAR's business. Can I ask whRichaaard-4/2/1999
7711 I must admit that I took it upon myself to send the press release to a few reletimwa-4/2/1999
7710 Tim - I would think that article would get some attention from prospective custStarlight-4/2/1999
7709 Yes, JPSI could do these things. They could do many things they have not done.Falstaff-4/2/1999
7708 Check out this article\interview with Richard Foster from PhotonicsOnline.com. timwa-4/1/1999
7707 I was thinking of this as one of the non-lithography applications of their softtimwa-4/1/1999
7706 From the same article referenced above: <i> But before that haStarlight-4/1/1999
7705 Article from Semiconductor Business News: Down towards the end there is some dtimwa-4/1/1999
7704 I agree. Many seem to misunderstand what the power level means and the mentionFalstaff-4/1/1999
7703 Thank you! Wonderful, simply wonderful! One of my favorite works of literaturFalstaff-4/1/1999
7702 Compare both with GNET, which was up 670% 1st quarter!!! Bucky Katt-4/1/1999
7701 Here's an update on the status of our JMAR-MSFT contest: techstocks.comStarlight-4/1/1999
7700 If a company warns about earnings it usually means that the decrease won't Richaaard-4/1/1999
7699 I think you are misreading JMAR's press release. I read the press release real_time99-3/31/1999
7698 Jim, thanks for the comments. I think over time this announcement will sink inBilberry-3/31/1999
7697 Bilberry, on this post i agree with you. there was some cymi news a while back James Bulliment-3/31/1999
7696 Lower than the 4th quarter? lower than 8.4 mil.. not bad for 1st quarter! lotimwa-3/31/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News