JMAR Technologies(JMAR) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
JMAR Technologies(JMAR)

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
9695	80	0	JMAR

Emcee: James Bowser	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
7745	I think the customer was DARPA but I don't think that this news delay had a	Richaaard	-	4/8/1999
7744	hmm - i suppose it could have been but ...DARPA's been a known qunatity fr	henry jakala	-	4/8/1999
7743	So you don't think DARPA was the customer they were referring to?	timwa	-	4/8/1999
7742	does anyone know if JMAR still has some PR in the wings ? i'm specifical	henry jakala	-	4/8/1999
7741	JMAR is officially changing its symbol. The new symbol is.... C-R-A-P ;^)	Candle stick	-	4/7/1999
7740	Here's an article about semi-equipment stocks that might be of interest: b	Starlight	-	4/7/1999
7739	There you go insulting parasites...	Mesaba	-	4/7/1999
7738	All we need now is a scathingly negative post from Gooch and then we might have	MRothaus1	-	4/7/1999
7737	Betty, Michael, Richaard, Henry: Thanks.	Falstaff	-	4/6/1999
7736	forget a lawsuit - lawsuits will only make the parasitic lawyers rich this co	henry jakala	-	4/6/1999
7735	I hear ya Henry. My sentiments exactly. Shareholders need to turn out in force	Richaaard	-	4/6/1999
7734	what i was trying to express was that current management is, IMO, lousy - seemi	henry jakala	-	4/6/1999
7733	I disagree.. I believe the tech is realize-able.. it's just gonna take more	Dave Swanson	-	4/6/1999
7732	try asking company management JMAR is a lost cause IMO - a buyout is our only	henry jakala	-	4/6/1999
7731	I think the 10-K raises much uncertainty in peoples minds.	Richaaard	-	4/6/1999
7730	There are many reasons why stocks move up or move down. I'm sure the recen	Starlight	-	4/6/1999
7729	JMAR could be down because of 2 very negatively worded paragraphs in the 10-K,	MRothaus1	-	4/6/1999
7728	Betty: Thanks, but let me press this just a bit. The SEMIndex is not a <i&g	Falstaff	-	4/6/1999
7727	It's probably because of the mixed performance of the semi equipment stocks	Starlight	-	4/6/1999
7726	I stopped trying to guess. It got 1/8 higher on this runup than on the previou	Mesaba	-	4/6/1999
7725	The warrants only have to reach 50 cents, and IMO there is a good chance of tha	FreedomForAll	-	4/6/1999
7724	Thanks. Now, I will demonstrate my wondrous ignorance about the market with a	Falstaff	-	4/6/1999
7723	<i>you are correct that I am knowledgeable</i> I like that attitud	Richaaard	-	4/5/1999
7722	Re: Warrants The difference is that in Nov of 1998 and in Jan 1999, the forwar	Richaaard	-	4/5/1999
7721	If what you say is true then the warrants would not be selling for 25 cents now	FreedomForAll	-	4/5/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):