SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTC
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
990 16 0 INTC
Emcee:  Jules B. Garfunkel Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
790 This is from my Zack's service. Not a pretty picture... ******************Richard P. Roberts-11/11/1997
789 Mark, and All I am told that Wall Street's concern for the Pentium flaw is Jules B. Garfunkel-11/11/1997
788 Jules your advice is sound. I purchased additional shares at 75 1/8 last week.John Carragher-11/9/1997
787 Jules..what's your feeling towards Options on Intel..sell calls,buy calls ,puborectalis-11/9/1997
786 Mark, My point was that short term misperceptions, or misinterpretations, by &qJules B. Garfunkel-11/8/1997
785 Inventory is irrelevent to the long-term investor. I haven't seen anyone aMark Brophy-11/8/1997
784 All, I just posted this on the Intel thread in reply to a post form Paul E. I wJules B. Garfunkel-11/8/1997
783 This is a well-established trend. Intel pays for the system software developmeMark Brophy-11/6/1997
782 Well Mark, it looks like Intel is accepting some leadership in DVD... Article..greenspirit-11/5/1997
781 What's going on? Gary >Please tell us it isn't so. You're not Gary Kao-11/3/1997
780 John, Please tell us it isn't so. You're not really leaving Intel'sJules B. Garfunkel-11/3/1997
779 Jules, Thanks for your friendly reply. <<As an X supervisor of semi FABsBrian Fukuba-11/3/1997
778 Jules, Regarding - "I still believe it is very significant, but as I askeLee Penick-11/3/1997
777 Jules, Check out this article, I don't like this development one bit. All wgreenspirit-11/2/1997
776 Yes Michael, it "looks like some pretty significant news to me!" alsoJules B. Garfunkel-11/2/1997
775 Jules, your welcome, but my small contribution posting a few articles from timegreenspirit-11/2/1997
774 Thanks Lee, and Thank you Michael, Yes, I had read Michael's post of the arJules B. Garfunkel-11/2/1997
773 Thanks Bill, I know you were only pointing out the Fortune article, but I wanteJules B. Garfunkel-11/2/1997
772 Jules, Did you see Michael Cummings post from 10/28/97 below? Perhaps, unfortLee Penick-11/2/1997
771 Jules, I was only pointing out the Fortune article. INTC is one of my long-termWilliam E Hodal-11/2/1997
770 Bill, As you are an RR I remind you of December 1995. Intel was at 52 (pre-spliJules B. Garfunkel-11/2/1997
769 Jules, I could not resist: "Most of all however, I would like to know why William E Hodal-11/2/1997
768 Brian, Thank you for your very kind words and recognition. As an X supervisor Jules B. Garfunkel-11/2/1997
767 Jules, Thanks for your all of your posts and insights. Especially appreciated Brian Fukuba-11/2/1997
766 Could anyone tell me the difference between intc and intcw, do the warrents (inSky-10/31/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):