SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
SAFESKIN
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
828 4 0 SFSK
Emcee:  scott blomquist Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
803 Dear Stock Profit, Sorry to hear about your misfortune with SFSK. I'm new Mad2-4/30/1999
802 Sold the last of this dog today. The only thing impressive about SFSK anymore Sunny Jim-4/30/1999
801 In other words talking to ones self is OK? If I understand correctly your suggMad2-4/30/1999
800 Mad2 It is now OK to talk to yourself. It is even OK to answer yourself. You dKirby D. Hames-4/30/1999
799 Chris if posting to oneself is like talking to oneself one might think your a bMad2-4/28/1999
798 <i>>Safeskin Renews Long Term Agreement With McKessonHBOC's MedicaBeltropolis Boy-4/28/1999
797 Well, there goes the silver lining. It looks like this cloud is about to becoFbk32-4/21/1999
796 net cash shrank, inventories grew, and debt load increased. how soon before thBeltropolis Boy-4/21/1999
795 two cents. ----- <b>Safeskin Reports Results for First Quarter of 1999,Beltropolis Boy-4/21/1999
794 <b>Safeskin Renews Long Term Agreement With McKessonHBOC's Medical GrBeltropolis Boy-4/15/1999
793 bauder evokes tricky dicky (jaffe) ... ----- <b>Safeskin's great exBeltropolis Boy-4/13/1999
792 <i>He (Irving)is in the hospital with amonia. That could be very bad atDr. Voodoo-4/13/1999
791 Mr. Irving Jaffe by: twapple1 4482 of 4482 Every Sfsk bull should send their Apple12-4/12/1999
790 I am amazed that this actually went up, but I am still very cautious of buying Fbk32-4/8/1999
789 I have passive write offs coming out of my nose! My family took over an undergApple12-4/7/1999
788 2 mill + shares traded to the up and a close almost at the high. This could meApple12-4/7/1999
787 See, I predict $5 a share and the stock pops a dollar. Anyone want to pay me tRobert Douglas-4/7/1999
786 I am impressed by the $1.00 rebound vs a $1-2 slump. I hope for everyones saFbk32-4/7/1999
785 As of 1:30 pm we are up almost a buck. This could be good. Still I do not thinkApple12-4/7/1999
784 Brian, I agree, I am looking for SFSK to hit $5 before I seriously consider buRobert Douglas-4/7/1999
783 OK, The past is dead & burried. As to the future of SFSK, I also read thatFbk32-4/7/1999
782 I think a 1Q rebound is very unrealistic. Many companies have had similar proFbk32-4/7/1999
781 Lets drop the past! I agree about the timing on the good news. Although that maApple12-4/7/1999
780 Brian, I found in 10Q reference to IRS audit of 95 & 96 Fed income tax retuMad2-4/7/1999
779 Bad day to release "positive" news. Thought you were not going to poFbk32-4/7/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):