| Reply | Message Preview | From | Recs | Posted |
| 8233 | Conspiracy! I think tat discussion belongd over here: Subject 52563 :-) | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8232 | It never even occurred to me that either smirked until others complained. Even n | Neocon | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8231 | Hissssss. :-) | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8230 | <i>a facial expression of the American Commander-in-Chief</i> I ass | Lane3 | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8229 | What a crock! | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8228 | Nope. Not true. All Poet did was refuse to give the $10 reward for thread cont | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8227 | Throwing me under the bus!!!! | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8226 | Please PM me any further information about what you might have in your hand. | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8225 | LOL! That sounds like classic Handey. | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8224 | Kick away! Better him than me. :-) | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8223 | I'll have you know that I am not here either. I am writing glorious poetry. | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8222 | Uh, I believe <i>Poet</i> appears to have made a disparaging comment | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8221 | What did you just do, compute your net worth? | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8220 | ;) don't even think about it let it just flow.... | Rainy_Day_Woman | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8219 | Just puttering today, filling out my monthly status reports for a couple of corp | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8218 | don't you have a big case pending? or something? :-)- | Rainy_Day_Woman | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8217 | LOL! Thanks. I think.... | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8216 | well we can't have him feeling neglected can we? busy as I am, I volunteer | Rainy_Day_Woman | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8215 | How long have you been shilling for the DNC??? Are you paid staff or a volunteer | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8214 | Remember back? Why did the Clinton peace proposals fail to conclude in a final a | TigerPaw | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8213 | Strangely, yes. But I think my mood is helped by being home from work, with win | thames_sider | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8212 | I know people say you shouldn't shoot the messenger, but it's hard to sh | thames_sider | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8211 | Pomposity. Pomposity. Hmmmmmm. I must give some thought to that category........ | E | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8210 | Have a ball...!! I hope you feel better now. JLA | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8209 | Uh, I believe Bill raised the smirk issue, implying that a smirk was a physical | E | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8208 | <resist/> One day you should treat yourself to an advanced dictionary. Y | thames_sider | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8207 | I am NOT here, I am working hard and virtuously, and I am NOT peeking in here, b | E | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8206 | If you look up male chauvinist pig/knuckle-dragging ape in the dictionary, you&# | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8205 | LOL! | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8204 | Yes. Materiality is most probably an issue of law decided by the Judge. JLA | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8203 | <i>an involuntary muscle tensing caused by stress</i> I heard somewh | TigerPaw | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8202 | That's a Twain quote I've never heard, and a goody. | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8201 | Well, here's mine, and it's far more apposite for me IMO... "Good | thames_sider | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8200 | Isn't he a riot? I think this is the place where Jack would simply say &quo | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8199 | The Secrets Of Life, Love, And The Universe According To Jack Handey hutchville. | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8198 | 0 > (-15 + -15) If you disagree, then never mind new maths; work on your bas | thames_sider | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8197 | Apparently so. He was also quite the gourmand. <s> If God dwells inside | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8196 | I knew we could count on you, JLA Does "material" suggest that it mus | J. C. Dithers | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8195 | LMAO! Now there's a guy who knows how to live. | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8194 | Crazy like a hawk. <s> Here's one of his classic epitaph suggestions, | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8193 | Could be worse. Could be stupid pompus liberal leftists. Then it's IQ -104 | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8192 | Stop it? I want to encourage it! All hot air and no substance! LOL! <i> | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8191 | If you'd like to stop the madness, I suggest you entertain these philosophic | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8190 | Didn't you used to "call" things when you were a kid? You know, l | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8189 | Ah, just like the old BR. A huge, out of control brawl. <s> | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8188 | JLA = thread founder => IQ -140 Laz = thread founder => IQ -140 Minus 140 | E | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8187 | <i>I call. </i> You call what? <i>No invoking Christ (much le | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8186 | That's funnier than Hell.... Oooppsss! Freudian slip. :^) | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8185 | Now <I>that</i> was great. I think we should institute a new new sy | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8184 | You mean "The Royal Compound", don't you? | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8183 | < Is a smirk now unconstitutional? > Yes. <smirk> | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8182 | <i> I'm the 'conservative' among my sibs... </i> That | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8181 | Hey! No invoking Christ (much less using His middle initial) unless you believe | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8180 | Speaking of skulls and laughter, may I post a few words of wisdom by the illustr | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8179 | ALL RIGHT! GOOD MAN! Get him on here! | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8178 | Uh oh. That's scary. But then again, I'm the 'conservative' am | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8177 | Apparently my skull is thicker than my skin. LOL You see, laugher is the best | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8176 | It does indeed, though your skin will not be as thick as before. Which is the po | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8175 | <i>How about "smirk"? Reevaluated yet?</i> Treason. Clear | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8174 | I am not sure you'd get along with my brother. He makes me seem positively | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8173 | Okay missy, you asked for it: If you go flying back through time, and you see | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8172 | I would love a great exfoliant. :^) But does it contain retinol and sun bloc | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8171 | The only explanation I can make is to borrow from the same source: If you saw tw | E | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8170 | Gee jcky, thanks for the reminder! You've got thick skin? I know a good e | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8169 | LOL!! I hope so.....otherwise, my job is not done... | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8168 | The standard for a new trial based upon new evidence varies from state to state. | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8167 | Hi Poet, I can enjoy a good joust or ribbing just like anyone else with thick s | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8166 | Oh brother......-g | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8165 | <i>mr allen is in serious trouble</i> How so? He's like me. If | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8164 | That's sound fair, or is it just? | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8163 | <i>humble brilliant righties here </i> I am obviously brilliant. T | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8162 | We need a criminal lawyer here... <i>In fact, new evidence demands a new | J. C. Dithers | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8161 | I think even the slowest of the humble brilliant righties here can distinguish a | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8160 | <I> where's that wolfpack I called for to take out E? </I> Out | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8159 | < On the smirk, I read somewhere where it was an involuntary muscle tensing c | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8158 | The meaning is there....and obviously understood... Toodles... JLA | jlallen | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8157 | Rise sharply, dear girl. That one person would so brilliant they could take on | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8156 | I am trying to figure this one out. Would you rewrite in Jack Handey style, ple | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8155 | Legally, I would think treason might be difficult to prove. But most of us know | Bill | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8154 | You're welcome, but keep in mind, Poet, that it's too bad that whole fam | E | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8153 | I think you got your math wrong: JLA = thread founder => IQ -140 Laz = th | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8152 | I heard Ron Kuby giving a defence of her on the news this morning. It wasn't | E | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8151 | It is amusing how obsessed you are with other people's IQs. Usually liberals | Bill | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8150 | You ever think about what those guys will do if they think I will always get the | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8149 | Thanks. I cannot fathom why anyone would get all riled up about that, even if he | Neocon | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8148 | Yeah, that's called "new math". That's the way you stupid lib | Lazarus_Long | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8147 | Thank you for that post. | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8146 | <I>The point was that one should argue temperately, rather than be dismiss | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8145 | Oh Gawd! LOL! If the three of you were all rolled into one, the PP-DP posting | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8144 | Well.... The law is the law.... :) | MulhollandDrive | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8143 | That's all? | Bill | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8142 | Dang leftist! | Bill | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8141 | Perite! | Bill | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8140 | < From what I've read, I think the woman should be disbarred. > Final | jcky | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8139 | <i>Funny, but Ashcroft strikes me as a lot older than McCartney.</i> | Lane3 | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8138 | Hey, that was a compliment to you! Mainly it was a straight line I just couldn& | E | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8137 | <i>Traditionalists seem to have too much reverence for the "stuff&quo | TigerPaw | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8136 | I agree, and that is why I object to being called a traditionalist. Nevertheless | Neocon | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8135 | 0 + 0 + 0 = 0. QED. But actually, you're more than equal: on current evide | thames_sider | - | 4/10/2002 |
| 8134 | Funny, but Ashcroft strikes me as a lot older than McCartney. | Poet | - | 4/10/2002 |
