SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Juniper Networks - JNPR
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3350 234 0 JNPR
Emcee:  Michael Wilson Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
825 Wes, AG is at it again. In a speech this morning, Greenspan said there was no rTom Hua-8/27/1999
824 mact, I know that a lot of modules are farmed out. CSCO does do it's own Wes Stevens-8/26/1999
823 Lucky.. I didn't research at all which I admitted...see previos post. HoweThe Phoenix-8/26/1999
822 Doh... don't I feel like a fool. I just assumed you guys know what you werThe Phoenix-8/26/1999
821 Again. you need to go look at the Cerent product.... it looks like this AccessThe Phoenix-8/26/1999
820 >>And, well, JNPR.... has the M40 and a forthcoming M4000 router.... too Lucky888-8/26/1999
819 <i>JNPR.... has the M40 and a forthcoming M4000 router.... </i> GaTom Hua-8/26/1999
818 wes, but many depend on outsourcing now...and this field will grow even more smact-8/26/1999
817 I have been saying backbone routing and I have not been clear. Junipers routWizard-8/26/1999
816 Wizard, IN all due respect, yesterday the carriers were talking about ATM as tThe Phoenix-8/26/1999
815 You can't divide it up as core is optical and routing is edge. Its just moWizard-8/26/1999
814 HUH???? What are you talking about? You don't need route processing in thThe Phoenix-8/26/1999
813 >>CSCO clearly believes in optics in the core.. not IP. Here we go agaiWizard-8/26/1999
812 CSCO clearly believes in optics in the core.. not IP. They will compete with JThe Phoenix-8/26/1999
811 JNPR -- I don't think CSCO will pay that price to ANY company... I don&#Lucky888-8/26/1999
810 Michelle, CSCO will not buy JNPR because Cisco already has the Cisco 12000 whicTom Hua-8/26/1999
809 <i>Cisco had already held about 8.2% of Cerent through a $13 million inveLizzie Tudor-8/26/1999
808 JNPR -- Guys, find out how much CSCO percentage of Cerent was already owned bLucky888-8/26/1999
807 Thanks Tom... I didn't realize it was a competing technology. I wonder if Lizzie Tudor-8/26/1999
806 <i>Csco's purchase price, which essentially ignores normal valuation The Phoenix-8/26/1999
805 JNPR -- The white paper is cool, but how about the price? If M40 is the cheapLucky888-8/26/1999
804 Cisco's purchase price, which essentially ignores normal valuation metrics,Wizard-8/26/1999
803 <i> I wonder why UUnet chose the M40. They must really be stupid, huh? &lThe Phoenix-8/26/1999
802 Alex: It's important to remember *people* at UUNET chose Juniper. UUNET sAlex Chilton-8/26/1999
801 Just a couple of points. One, Cerent's product is not a terabit product, yeBill-8/26/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):