LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
834	To all shorts!!!!!!! Fred has "acknowledged". Folks!!!!!!!! Read	RCDTD	-	9/13/1999
833	Mike- you are absolutely right. One thing about shorts: there posts are so tran	Andy B	-	9/12/1999
832	i am not so sure that on the way to being interesting to some VC guys in SF tha	Peter Sherman	-	9/12/1999
831	Oops...calculation error in previous post... LUMM is currently trading at appro	surelock	-	9/12/1999
830	Interesting set of information you present. It bespeaks a person who must have	John Curtis	-	9/12/1999
829	> Prospects for sales growth are impressive. Studies show that the market fo	surelock	-	9/12/1999
828	Note to the board The shorts are in the house Read some of the profiles and the	Mike Hardy	-	9/12/1999
827	Surelock; Great finds, great research. I always find it amusing how the bulls	jjs64	-	9/12/1999
826	> Right now I'm more suspicious of the dirt throwers than I am of LUMM a	surelock	-	9/12/1999
825	CM, Check out the full translation of yesterdays article. It mentions LUMM appl	RCDTD	-	9/12/1999
824	Yes you have to have audited financials filed with the SEC to get a Nasdaq list	who cares?	-	9/12/1999
823	I'm with you Bob!!!	RCDTD	-	9/12/1999
822	MNTX? yikes. Didn't they have a pretty good PP as well?	ayn rand	-	9/12/1999
821	<but the presence of board member Saviuk, and involvement of MNTX and PICA	Bob A Louie	-	9/12/1999
820	Compliments of Big Al on RB: Le Devoir article full text translation: Here g	RCDTD	-	9/12/1999
819	The first two items below are articles written by Iraj Najafi, and the link is	surelock	-	9/12/1999
818	I agree - at least in the short term very extended - expect some selling pressu	Jimbo	-	9/12/1999
817	The volume and the fact that it closed down $2 from the high and near the low o	reg	-	9/12/1999
816	MikeY: <i>...The 2 companies have nothing to do with each other the vanc	wonk	-	9/12/1999
815	Gilderite, this first article on LUMM indicates the shares. However, it exclude	RCDTD	-	9/12/1999
814	I would like to find out the proportion of the current float owned by MOLEX, an	gilderite	-	9/12/1999
813	Dear RCDTD, If this Dow Jones article by Dunnett has just come out over th	Yankee Trader	-	9/11/1999
812	Yankee, the first I'm not sure about. It was extracted from a post on the J	RCDTD	-	9/11/1999
811	RCDTD, Thanks so much for posting this article. Do you happen to know the	Yankee Trader	-	9/11/1999
810	Translates to:"...the studies show that the market of the dense spectral m	Praxis	-	9/11/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):