SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
RRRR: Rare Medium Group (soon to be) formerly ICC
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1150 30 0 RRRR
Emcee:  ztect Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
850 Charles, When I use the term "incorrigible," it is meant in the sensCF Rebel-9/30/1999
849 Charlie: Why are you so intent on saving us from our selves? Is this some religBernie Sturr-9/30/1999
848 > I see you're sort of the person who hangs around after Can't winMahatmabenfoo-9/30/1999
847 > incorrigible I didn't know I was "incorrigible". I supposeMahatmabenfoo-9/30/1999
846 QuietWon, The incorrigible Mr. Kramer sold out of RRRR back in April. SomethiCF Rebel-9/29/1999
845 RRRR doing quite well today, larger volm today than past few days/weeks -- lookQuietWon-9/29/1999
844 ok, Charles, I see you're sort of the person who hangs around after owning QuietWon-9/29/1999
843 > Should I quote you thinking that RRRR is trying to be a CMGI ? My pointMahatmabenfoo-9/28/1999
842 Charles, are you short or what? Should I quote you thinking that RRRR is tryinQuietWon-9/28/1999
841 You seem to be comparing internet stocks, saying that if one has a huge market Mahatmabenfoo-9/28/1999
840 To: wallstreeter who wrote (100320) From: QuietWon Tuesday, Sep 28 1999 2:16PM QuietWon-9/28/1999
839 > call me crazy oh, I wouldn't do that, and I mean no disrespect. I beMahatmabenfoo-9/28/1999
838 Charles, call me crazy, but I really don't see a parallel to 1929. SpeculaSecularBull-9/27/1999
837 this is all pretty-off topic. we can rehash it again at Dow 12,000. in the meanJerry Miller-9/27/1999
836 >you're living in the past. If only I could live in the past! I'd Mahatmabenfoo-9/27/1999
835 > While the Yahoos, Pricelines, Ebays, AOLs and Amazons of... > that advaMahatmabenfoo-9/27/1999
834 Charles, I think that you and Jerry are both right and wrong. The real issue iSecularBull-9/27/1999
833 ...like i said, "archaic and out of touch with reality." this is notJerry Miller-9/27/1999
832 > are as touch with reality, as the traditional valuation out of touch withMahatmabenfoo-9/27/1999
831 that clown Ballmer's comments last week, as well as your recent post here, Jerry Miller-9/26/1999
830 I think this may be a repeat - Sands Bros article---> theinternetanalyst.cQuietWon-9/24/1999
829 well, consider this: Steve Balmer's comment yesterday about internet stockMahatmabenfoo-9/24/1999
828 << particularly when the sale is at the << Sale? They just filed..The Street-9/24/1999
827 Although there are many good reasons for owners of a stock to sell, you must knMark Peterson CPA-9/23/1999
826 so what's your point ?Jerry Miller-9/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News