SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
QUANTUM
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9124 27 0 QNTM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8549 The deal is for high end drives. Most of QNTM's drives are desktop. IBM is Henry W Singor-3/5/1999
8548 It is NOT exclusive, but gives DELL buyers an "incentive" to buy fromSam-3/4/1999
8547 Does anyone know whether the IBM/DELL deal affects QNTM? It appears that DELL dr_elis-3/4/1999
8546 A.E. and all, EMC expects a $50B market by 2002. How much of that will QNTM getGottfried-3/2/1999
8545 Quantum Expects 1999 Disk-Drive Growth, CEO Brown Tells CNBC March 2 (BloombeA. Edwards-3/2/1999
8544 See the RDRT thread, good commentary there. Alan Casey-3/2/1999
8543 Did anyone actually catch the CEO on Squawk Box today? -JOhn john dodson-3/2/1999
8542 Sam, the dd companies are cyclicle high tech growth stocks. Because of this cyLutz Moeller-3/2/1999
8541 QNTM CEO to be on cnbc's squawk box in the 9:40 a.m. area tomorrow morning.kendall harmon-3/1/1999
8540 Maverick, I guess my whole thought on the recent QNTM news is this: The sum oHungry Investor-3/1/1999
8539 Quantum to expand in storage systems Maverick-3/1/1999
8538 Disk drive maker Quantum Corp. (Nasdaq:QNTM - news) spun ahead $3 1/8, or 19%, Maverick-3/1/1999
8537 <<Does anyone have a new valuation model built around Tape separate from Z Analyzer-3/1/1999
8536 Wonder how they're gonna convert current QNTM options? Numbers like 1/3 anjohn dodson-3/1/1999
8535 Well, it should be a wash quantitatively, at least initially. It all depends ojohn dodson-3/1/1999
8534 Don't like the sound of that much. 50 shares X $6.66 + 100 shares at $13.33chaz-3/1/1999
8533 Does anyone have a new valuation model built around Tape separate from DD biz? still learning-3/1/1999
8532 intresting. i m sure the split made according to forward erning of each side oSonki-3/1/1999
8531 Sure. Just like when a stock splits. I was only talking about the initial valjohn dodson-3/1/1999
8530 Yeah, but only for an instant in time. The next trading day, if buyer's liKevinThompson-3/1/1999
8529 Re: "The reason it is bullish is because the whole company is valued currjohn dodson-3/1/1999
8528 Lutz, I didn't mean that we would double out of the chute. I did, though, mSam-3/1/1999
8527 John, I think a conference call with saying we did 30% earnings on the tape biLutz Moeller-3/1/1999
8526 Sam You were right with the tape biz spin off. So far in quarter hour we didnLutz Moeller-3/1/1999
8525 Lutz, Just curious, but why is this so bullish? Seems like one of the "tjohn dodson-3/1/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News