SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
FPA Medical Management - FPAMQ
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1110 6 0 FPAMQ
Emcee:  Sae Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
860 Wiseowl, I think you might be able to wait and get it cheaper. I got a 50% retVanni Resta-7/7/1998
859 Doug and Richard D., Thanks for the replies. Doug, thanks for that in-depthKurthend-7/7/1998
858 Well, I usually buy too soon. Last time I bought at 1 3/8, then 1 3/16. Then IBald Eagle-7/7/1998
857 Richard D. I believe that you are right. Not a peep came from FPAM (at least puDouglas V. Fant-7/7/1998
856 FWIW, the Bear Stearns PPM analyst said that FPA's CA ops were recently a Diamondcutter-7/7/1998
855 Douglas, The fact that FPA has happily tossed the whole of Pacificare overboaRichard D-7/7/1998
854 Laparrot, I have no illusions about this stock- it will take a while to get theDouglas V. Fant-7/7/1998
853 Please come and check my new thread: techstocks.comBald Eagle-7/7/1998
852 Excellent analysis, Doug. I think you're right on the money. Laparrot-7/7/1998
851 Kurt, "A Tale of Two Industries".... FPAM's advisors' languagDouglas V. Fant-7/7/1998
850 Vanni, I was tempted to buy back in today at 1 1/4 or below. What do you think Bald Eagle-7/6/1998
849 Richard, more news. Regards, Tom Bloomberg News July 6, 1998, 4:42 p.m. Tom Hua-7/6/1998
848 Kurt, This, along with the other money loser, Pacificare, are out with a swifRichard D-7/6/1998
847 Doug, I just came across this article/news release. I hope this doesn't sKurthend-7/6/1998
846 Morning Gang. What we need is renewed optimism by the "big boys" forLaparrot-7/6/1998
845 Kurt, The success in the lawsuits is inversely corollated to FPAM's successDouglas V. Fant-7/5/1998
844 RichardD., Agreed! Your revenue stream is like engine thrust on an airplane witDouglas V. Fant-7/5/1998
843 Doug, I mentioned a few months ago when FPAM took its dive down to its currentKurthend-7/5/1998
842 Douglas, I have read on Yahoo that these are near the worst if not the worst cRichard D-7/5/1998
841 RichardD., I'll ride this one for a couple of years and see what happens- iDouglas V. Fant-7/5/1998
840 Douglas, Thanks, hopefully we get some follow-on news. I strongly suspect newsRichard D-7/4/1998
839 Mcujo, Agreed- Not predicting a winner necessarily, but we look like we set a bDouglas V. Fant-7/4/1998
838 You guys aware of this: newsalert.com jim Chartgod-7/3/1998
837 Bollinger bands have also steadily tightened. Less volatility. Now showing a tMightycujo-7/3/1998
836 Richard D., One more technical indicator turned upward on FPAMon Thursday, and Douglas V. Fant-7/3/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):