SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Nextwave Telecom Inc.
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1088 34 0 WAVE
Emcee:  Michael Allard Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
863Maurice -- really good stuff ! (not just post 859 ...) Thanks. Jon.Jon Koplik-1/28/2003
862Wow Mq, right on the button! You sure are an international expert on law and stMaurice Winn-1/27/2003
861Mq, you are too kind to Senator Hollings. <<i> PS: I can sympathize wMaurice Winn-1/27/2003
860Hey, PCS. Nyah, nyah, nyah!!! The Supreme Court of the USA allows <<i>Maurice Winn-1/27/2003
859Senator Hollings blows the chance of getting many $$billions for the US governmeMaurice Winn-1/27/2003
858Yes Mq - this is a nice way for at least one government/private industry saga tokech-1/27/2003
857What a lift for the day. I am so happy! I own nothing in Nextwave - the nearesMaurice Winn-1/27/2003
856Nextwave comments on the case.... nextwavetel.com The Supreme Court opinion...slacker711-1/27/2003
855Dave -- re : wuz NextWave common stock worth now ? -- I really have no idea. ThJon Koplik-1/27/2003
854Supreme Court: NextWave Can Keep Licenses January 27, 2003 By REUTERS Filed aJon Koplik-1/27/2003
853Hi Jon..Nextwave Wins! Any thoughts on valuation or how to play it from here? DaveMG-1/27/2003
852URL for stock quote on NextWave : pinksheets.com (Just in case things actuallyJon Koplik-1/10/2003
851NextWave Ruling Could Come Tuesday [1/14/03]. wirelessweek.com By Mark RockwelJon Koplik-1/10/2003
850Wow..Up 25% since I started posting..DaveMG-11/7/2002
849I read what was posted on the thread, and it appears that the justices were rathJGoren-10/29/2002
848<i> Is see your point. For the record, I owned Nextwave stock at $5, soldpcstel-10/25/2002
847<I> Salmasi is a very wealthy guy, but also because the amount of potentiapcstel-10/25/2002
846<I> Congress would not allow this to happen. </I> You're only fpcstel-10/25/2002
845Hi JG..Have you had a read thru the transcript? Do you agree with what seems to DaveMG-10/24/2002
844Is see your point. For the record, I owned Nextwave stock at $5, sold it at $11,Michael Allard-10/23/2002
843It's also my understanding that NextW has other grounds upon which it might DaveMG-10/23/2002
842I don't see much public interest in the FCC's agenda. I was hoping thatJGoren-10/23/2002
841This premise while potentially technically correct is not plausible. Once the Swlan1957-10/23/2002
840"Regarding pulling the license,respectfully.....Wrong!" I think you apcstel-10/23/2002
839Regarding pulling the license,respectfully.....Wrong! The FCC can not pull the Michael Allard-10/22/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News