SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10293 141 0 REFR
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8793I don't believe you Bill. You solicited investors on the internet to write tN. Dixon-2/10/2003
8792Bill, You are the one who chose to "bother" REFR investors. You have N. Dixon-2/10/2003
8791Your link has plenty of suspects but is desperately in search of a crime. A hedgBill Ulrich-2/10/2003
8790Anyway, how could you ever doubt he is a nice guy?...<vbg>Mike M-2/10/2003
8789Oh and one more thing Dixon... Quite soon I will no longer be short a single shBill Wexler-2/10/2003
8788I am confused. I am willing to step up to the plate and document my innocence (Bill Wexler-2/10/2003
8787I already (repeatedly) explained I have nothing to do with Asensio, Wilkins, &quBill Wexler-2/10/2003
8786Bill, What possible reason would I want to meet you? What an ego you have. It aN. Dixon-2/10/2003
8785Bill, Since we know you work with other investors, I assume you have a short aN. Dixon-2/10/2003
8784Once again. I will be more than happy to provide the trade confirmations. PleaBill Wexler-2/10/2003
8783Sure you are Bill.N. Dixon-2/10/2003
8782I offered to meet Dixon face-to-face several times (she claims to live in San FrBill Wexler-2/10/2003
8781Hey Dixon, I'm covering a few thousand shares of the REFR fraud every day wBill Wexler-2/10/2003
8780Laugh it off if you want Kevin but it has to be just a matter of time before a fMike M-2/10/2003
8779Kevin... >>The real question, however, is beginning to look like, how indBob Trocchi-2/10/2003
8778Kevin, There are no REFR "shills." What bothers you so much about iN. Dixon-2/10/2003
8777<I>The real question, however, is beginning to look like, how independent Kevin Podsiadlik-2/10/2003
8776Oh shit, now look who's come out of the woodwork!!!Pete Mason-2/10/2003
8775How does being on the wrong side of short sales during the most irrationally bulDanZ-2/10/2003
8774<<<i>So you're basically saying that Bill's shorts took it oMike M-2/9/2003
8773Wow! This sure could explain a lot. I appreciate your posting this.Mike M-2/9/2003
8772Bill, I was around when you were posting on the REFR board in 1998 to short aN. Dixon-2/9/2003
8771<i>Yes, and another woman going as "alien" (with a bunch of numbN. Dixon-2/9/2003
8770<I>Were you around when I was shorting the Y2K frauds (such as Zitel, TavaKevin Podsiadlik-2/9/2003
8769Dale, ZIXI spent $30M to operate, REFR spends $4M. ZIXI has four primary produN. Dixon-2/9/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):