SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
PLFM - Undervalued with great potential
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9096 26 0 PLFM
Emcee:  Rich Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8796 Kain, if you find that I am wrong, then please let me know. However, since a Mike-1/14/2000
8795 <b>******************** NEWS NEWS NEWS********************</b> bizBishopsChild-1/14/2000
8794 Is the talk of a reverse split from a PR I missed? Or is this just conjecture?tony schwarz-1/14/2000
8793 Mike, regarding reverse split. I seriously doubt the legality of the authorizedkaintuck 119-1/14/2000
8792 For those of you who follow the RB board, the question was raised: How would aMike-1/14/2000
8791 The bid seems to be stuck at .40 cents. Regardless of the current price........tony schwarz-1/13/2000
8790 My compliments to everyone who didn't fall for the MM game. If they want tMike-1/13/2000
8789 I spoke too soon! LOL What must have happened is someone sold some shares at Mike-1/13/2000
8788 Well, a little more sanity. The spread just closed up .49/.55.Mike-1/13/2000
8787 I agree and HOPE we're right. A .14 spread would seem to support your reaswalleye-1/13/2000
8786 FWIW I think the MM's took advantage of the fact that the PR was not what Mike-1/12/2000
8785 <Come on it is a joke. It doesn't even give the web site. Which one are baystock-1/12/2000
8784 Yes, I did; gives one the impression there are a bunch of kids doing the websitCarol Putnam-1/12/2000
8783 Did you all see the PR posted by Bacco on RB. That PR has the URL's. Reallycliff emohs-1/12/2000
8782 One piece of information from the old web site: 216.112.92.165 that I have beeCarol Putnam-1/12/2000
8781 EYE think it is the MM's and the BASHERS that are responsible. They are tBIG EYE-1/12/2000
8780 Walleye, This isn't as lame as it might seem. Changes made to the web sitMike-1/12/2000
8779 Don't jump off the deep end on us Cliff. I know How frustrating this inveSteve-1/12/2000
8778 Come on it is a joke. It doesn't even give the web site. Which one are we tcliff emohs-1/12/2000
8777 walleye -PR is good start at shaping up PLFM's image. Before you would wanNYBellBoy-1/12/2000
8776 I see the press release and Web upgrade as a step towards keeping off of the piwalleye-1/12/2000
8775 ********UPGRADE WEBSITE ????????*********** biz.yahoo.com Wednesday January 1BishopsChild-1/12/2000
8774 Platforms Upgrades Website for Disclosure Compliance - PR Newswire biz.yahoo.cSteve-1/12/2000
8773 All of you are correct. It never went above $1.90, the rise was due to ADCT, ancliff emohs-1/12/2000
8772 The stock has not gone over 1.90 (at least since 1997). As I recall it was therRocky Luman-1/12/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News