SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8818Interesting posts/dialogue! i.e., "..should one buy now or wait..?" FNS-6/21/2001
8817Jacob I agree too re. WCOM not being a longterm holding just now. That is why MJ-6/21/2001
8816OK. We're not really seeing different things. We just have different strateJacob Snyder-6/20/2001
8815Jacob I agree with you about the selling climax last year. However, I would nMJ-6/20/2001
8814Let me go back----I invest technically, however I have to be sure that there is MJ-6/20/2001
8813It's amazing that two intelligent people can look at the same chart and comeJacob Snyder-6/20/2001
8812And I don't mean to totally dismiss a chart. It helps sometimes. My point wBWAC-6/20/2001
8811I cannot speak to net asset value. While I don't ignore fundamentals totalMJ-6/20/2001
8810So how far below net asset value would you suggest one begin buying?BWAC-6/20/2001
8809IMO anyone considering buying WCOM for long term should wait until the "kniMJ-6/20/2001
8808Time to buy. Caveat: this is probably not a LT position. I've set limit ordJacob Snyder-6/20/2001
8807This isn't a 'shakeout'. Its a 'ShakeDown'. Speak Bernie. SBWAC-6/20/2001
8806BWAC: <Ain't no covering going on. Apparently won't be none either.&FNS-6/20/2001
8805Covering of what? Eyes? Ears? Grave that they are burying WCOM in? Ain't no BWAC-6/20/2001
8804Made two buys at basis of 14.26 Today, should see some covering at this level inHandsOn-6/20/2001
8803<We're now down to the March lows...; i.e.,14.50> Nope. 14.04 now. HeBWAC-6/20/2001
8802Jacob: <I just placed limit buy orders for WCOM at 15, 14.5, and 14. > OFNS-6/20/2001
8801Hi B, Yep, I usually keep things around until I can't remember when I boughtOldAIMGuy-6/20/2001
8800HA!TheStockFairy-6/20/2001
8799Wow. Tom Veale throwing in the towel. Seriously this surprises me. Thats not youBWAC-6/19/2001
8798Hi JS and other WCOM holders, Because of mostly boredom I sold out of my WCOM aOldAIMGuy-6/19/2001
8797WCOM stays in the S&P 500, but MCIT is not so index fund managers are probabHandsOn-6/19/2001
8796R.D.B: The cash cow for the entity is MCIT. At current prices,it is a steal and Doug-6/19/2001
8795Maybe people just realize that ICIX shareholders will also get MCIT, therefore, zyx1996-6/19/2001
8794Arbs will only close positions if the spread is too small to justify holding Oeconomicus-6/19/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News