SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.
An SI Board Since February 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2484 45 0 LUMM
Emcee:  Currency Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
884 Don, do you still have the literature on the advantages of PHASIC technology wrRCDTD-9/18/1999
883 RCDTD, Thanks to both you and Don. These people are in my neck of the woods soKent Rattey-9/18/1999
882 <<Anyone heard of these people?>> Not only heard of them, I'veDon Johnstone-9/18/1999
881 Kent, I've been tracking them for some time and receive updates from them. RCDTD-9/18/1999
880 Anyone heard of these people? Got a nanosecond? Just about everyone knows by Kent Rattey-9/18/1999
879 Frank and Leon, I will be visiting LUMM this coming Friday. I will take LeonRCDTD-9/18/1999
878 Leon, I have no way of knowing what the linkage might be between their work in Frank A. Coluccio-9/17/1999
877 The question that I am trying to answer for myself is whether: (1) LUMM's pConky Lives!-9/17/1999
876 SEPTEMBER' 99Mike Hardy-9/17/1999
875 LUMM and Photonics East LUMM informs me that Iraj Najafi and Mark Andrews who Don Johnstone-9/17/1999
874 Myke Y, very well said! eomClaude M-9/17/1999
873 Shorter beware LUMM has a small float shorting can cause damage to your capitalMike Hardy-9/17/1999
872 My brokers list the stock as non-margin and it must be marginable to short. I aCosmo Daisey-9/17/1999
871 I am in the DWDM industry. I can't see how LUMM can have viable 8 channel oCJ Quantumwell-9/16/1999
870 Has anybody tried to short this stock? I couldn't find shares to borrow. CJ Quantumwell-9/16/1999
869 While 2.5 million is nothing for a company the size of Molex, there is no way tAndy B-9/16/1999
868 Leon, I think those passages you quote were directed towards LUMM's desire Don Johnstone-9/16/1999
867 Andy, don't bother responding jj. This person has some strange agenda or laRCDTD-9/16/1999
866 Andy; In answer to your questions: <I>Was Molex tricked into taking a 2jjs64-9/16/1999
865 Was Molex tricked into taking a 25% stake in this Company? Why would they be inAndy B-9/16/1999
864 jjs, most outfits who dove into the POF space in the past had a hard time of itFrank A. Coluccio-9/16/1999
863 jjs, Your observations coupled with the news that they haven't made it workCosmo Daisey-9/16/1999
862 Frank; Friends in the fiber world tell me that LUMM was/is a struggling POF prjjs64-9/16/1999
861 Hello Leon, I found your observation and question interesting. Perhaps, for somFrank A. Coluccio-9/16/1999
860 I originally dismissed LUMM back in July because of their press release: July Conky Lives!-9/16/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):