SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Bad investing information/advice on the net contest
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
214 7 0
Emcee:  The Other Analyst Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
89 From you, my dear, this is high praise indeed! Now off to do some fundamental Edwarda-8/12/1999
88 Just so! The Other Analyst-8/12/1999
87 This one is a pip! He's defining fundamental analysis using valuation toolEdwarda-8/12/1999
86 What is fundamental analysis...NOT ragingbull.com "Dr. Bob" at RagingThe Other Analyst-8/12/1999
85 Good morning, have some coffee, and stop talking to yourself, said the stern woEdwarda-8/1/1999
84 What am I, chopped liver? Edwarda-8/1/1999
83 Have you taken a look at this site: sficorp.co.crEdwarda-8/1/1999
82 <i> Why are you posting to yourself? </i> It only looks like I am The Other Analyst-7/29/1999
81 Another reason to feel despair, that some of these people actually enter the woEdwarda-7/29/1999
80 Bad information example from the Harvard Business School..... Some have criticThe Other Analyst-7/28/1999
79 OK, but I still think the piece was in jest. On the subject of whether there aThe Other Analyst-7/20/1999
78 A market timing system that has NEVER failed? Great find. I wonder how long iThe Other Analyst-7/20/1999
77 This is merely a press release, but I must admit, it gave me a moment's pauEdwarda-7/20/1999
76 Dahling, you flatter me! ;-) Edwarda-7/20/1999
75 Now here's a site: vectorvest.com I haven't finished exploring it, buEdwarda-7/20/1999
74 I thought he was asking you to be the compelling prize<g> Jorj X Mckie-7/19/1999
73 Yes, dear, it was satirical. However, I thought it would be of enjoyment to poEdwarda-7/19/1999
72 I would argue that that piece was not written in jest. There are a large numTom Swift-7/19/1999
71 The link you cited contains a satirical piece (at least I assume it is satiricaThe Other Analyst-7/19/1999
70 F.Y.I. Message 10546620Edwarda-7/19/1999
69 <i>Perhaps we need to make the prize more compelling. Would you want to vEdwarda-7/15/1999
68 This one kind of tickled me, particularly the section on "About." ItEdwarda-7/15/1999
67 What tickled me is that that is all it said. ============== That is all it neThe Other Analyst-7/15/1999
66 They are indeed preferred. If they have gone through a Supervisory Analyst at The Other Analyst-7/15/1999
65 Thank you, Winston Churchill The Other Analyst-7/15/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):