SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10293 141 0 REFR
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9118My "version" of stock manipulation comes from a former SEC employee whN. Dixon-2/17/2003
9117Actrade, Aremisoft, Avant (criminal indictment of its officers), Zonagen (hand sBill Wexler-2/17/2003
9116Ummm, yes, I've seen your version of "documented fact" towards thiBill Ulrich-2/17/2003
9115Billie, just wondering if the name calling and self promotion is compensation foMike M-2/17/2003
9114There are no bad companies, Mike. Only those that fail at the mercy of evil syndBill Ulrich-2/17/2003
9113Bill, That's not even the subject. The subject is illegal shorting, extortiN. Dixon-2/17/2003
9112Sure Bill. That's what I meant with "this thread celebrates that distoMike M-2/17/2003
9111Re:<<<i>Because you see, one can't help but notice that a huge pMike M-2/17/2003
9110Every company failure is the result of an evil syndicate plotting against it. JuBill Ulrich-2/17/2003
9109Ooh, a "syndicate"! Still a favorite buzzword on the conspiracy hit lKevin Podsiadlik-2/17/2003
9108Kevin, you're smart and articulate. If you're going to respond to my coMike M-2/17/2003
9107REFR shills can't seem to get ANYTHING right!!! messages.yahoo.comBill Wexler-2/17/2003
9106I actually have no problem with companies going IPO while they are still in deveBill Wexler-2/17/2003
9105<I>disrupt the markets and defeat the efforts of small companies coming toKevin Podsiadlik-2/17/2003
9104Still, Kevin, it gets to the meat of the matter. It begs the question "areMike M-2/17/2003
9103I don't know if I'd be quoting Robert Flaherty with such abandon there NKevin Podsiadlik-2/16/2003
9102<i>Instead of wasting all this energy writing thousands of messages, why nN. Dixon-2/16/2003
9101Thickens, Hank, the plot thickens. Anyway, I long suspected.<g>Mike M-2/15/2003
9100I should clarify one small point here. Of the list of Asensio stocks you'veHank-2/15/2003
9099Dixon...are you f--king stupid, or simply insane? Read carefully: I have COVERBill Wexler-2/15/2003
9098"Bill" You have lied about REFR, about management, about individual iN. Dixon-2/15/2003
9097I find all this speculation about my "true identity" extremely amusingBill Wexler-2/15/2003
9096Market timer, pfft. Yes, everybody does it, and it all works. Perhaps a little RockyBalboa-2/15/2003
9095Nah. I'm not wrong. I offered to meet you and I extend the same offer agaiBill Wexler-2/14/2003
9094Re: An open letter to REFR investors. by: bill_wexler_fraud_exposed 02/14/03 06N. Dixon-2/14/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News