SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
TA-Quotes Plus
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
11149 121 0
Emcee:  Douglas Schneider Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9224 That worked fine Bob.. thanks.. I saw some notes on Hammer code and thought thPeter H. Mack-4/3/1999
9223 Holy Cow, the Holy Grail Unfortunately this memo was posted two days later thJohn Schott-4/3/1999
9222 Yup, thought that was what you were referring to. SorryJohn Schott-4/3/1999
9221 "Nitpickers, who don't know what they have with Quotes plus have littlRichard Estes-4/3/1999
9220 Richard <i>output "newscan.lst"; input "oldscan.lst"Clarence Dodge-4/3/1999
9219 yes just use old scan as input. output "newscan.lst"; input "olRichard Estes-4/3/1999
9218 Richard <i>That process can put extra invisible marks.</i> That mClarence Dodge-4/3/1999
9217 Use !=, Peter. Bob Jagow-4/3/1999
9216 Here's my Holy Grail Scan, which was revealed to me on Good Friday after daTechTrader42-4/3/1999
9215 I see nothing wrong. I assume you copied and pasted. That process can put extraRichard Estes-4/3/1999
9214 Blake: Here's another version of the scan, which has a slightly different oTechTrader42-4/3/1999
9213 John <i>If I recall correctly, that was valid with older versions of QP2Clarence Dodge-4/3/1999
9212 Data Splitting If I recall correctly, that was valid with older versions of QJohn Schott-4/3/1999
9211 dICK I split the data (optimized) between 2 drives as was recommended.This is Clarence Dodge-4/3/1999
9210 Richard re: PTATR sample scan My qp2 comes up with syntax errors in the folloClarence Dodge-4/3/1999
9209 What you are looking for is a global variable to use. unfortunately, the designPeter H. Mack-4/2/1999
9208 <i>That is exactly what I was trying to find a workaround or solution forunixgeek-4/2/1999
9207 That is exactly what I was trying to find a workaround or solution for. Thank yJonathan Sibley-4/2/1999
9206 <i>Clearly you could print an incremented cariable in the report</i&gunixgeek-4/2/1999
9205 Brooke....LOL...Thanks for the scan and the commentary. >gg< You put someBlake Turner-4/2/1999
9204 Blake: Here's the highest close (the alternative scan I sent before). Note TechTrader42-4/2/1999
9203 Brooke, I wanted to specify that the close of the stock was the highest close Blake Turner-4/2/1999
9202 Thanks Richard and Brooke. I will do some in depth analysis over the weekend aBlake Turner-4/2/1999
9201 I agree. To require that they close right at the high of the day seems arbitrarTechTrader42-4/2/1999
9200 The use of the close is more reasonable. I didn't recognize many of the stoRichard Estes-4/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News