SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
934 Hi guys....please don't interpret this post as taking anyone's side in James H. Williams-3/18/1997
933 Sunny MU earnings article....... biz.yahoo.comScrapps-3/18/1997
932 Agreed! And if they beat the estimates, we may need to hold on because it coulScrapps-3/18/1997
931 Milan give me a break! To many if's and maybe's, and if that's howScrapps-3/18/1997
930 Hi Scrapps, don't think MU beat whispers. From what I've heard there wsunny-3/18/1997
929 MU had been running up big time before earning report, and then sold on news. Xpiderman-3/18/1997
928 <i>Well Xy is it going to be like MU & MUEI? COMS beats earnings estiMilan Shah-3/18/1997
927 Well Xy is it going to be like MU & MUEI? COMS beats earnings estimates thScrapps-3/18/1997
926 COMS: FIRST CALL EARNINGS ESTIMATES COMS 3Com Corp. Xpiderman-3/18/1997
925 Sunny here is a link........ that Dwight could use. :-)) cox.comScrapps-3/18/1997
924 Dwight as you yak on and on please don't put words in my mouth, you've Scrapps-3/18/1997
923 Scrapps, sunny, it looks like we will have to agree to disagree. Scrapps, I didDwight E. Karlsen-3/18/1997
922 Thanks, Scrapps. Seems we agree - hopefully not a bad sign for 'ya..<bsunny-3/18/1997
921 <i>Scrapp, by materially insignificant, I mean in the context of the threScrapps-3/18/1997
920 Dwight, I hope USRX doesn't think the way you do. If there's only a 10sunny-3/18/1997
919 new USRX modem for portable computers news.comDouglas Perkins-3/18/1997
918 Don't get me wrong, Scrapps, if my local cable access company offered unlimDwight E. Karlsen-3/18/1997
917 Scrapp, by materially insignificant, I mean in the context of the threat represDwight E. Karlsen-3/18/1997
916 >>x2/xdsl/isdn, cable is going to take a back seat<< The back set Scrapps-3/18/1997
915 Dwight >> but cable modems are in all respects now and for the fore-seeaScrapps-3/18/1997
914 Agreed. But if you mention ISDN...I don't think it fits in the category of sunny-3/18/1997
913 sunny, you didn't bore me, rather I acknowledged that the news was interestDwight E. Karlsen-3/18/1997
912 Sunny, I wonder if this in some way explains COMS "important" announHassell Anderson-3/18/1997
911 Dwight, with all respect, <b>this</b> is one of the two main cominsunny-3/18/1997
910 Interesting sunny, but cable modems are "materially insignificant" inDwight E. Karlsen-3/18/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):